test(zcash): cover NU6.3 Ironwood signing - #200
Merged
Conversation
BitHighlander
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 30, 2026 19:42
This was referenced Jul 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
NU6.3 adds the Ironwood value pool and transaction-v6 signing contract. The firmware integration harness must exercise the new pool selector and fifth ZIP-229 component digest before firmware can be considered releasable.
What changed
device-protocolto the exact upstream Ironwood commitf2246ceshielded_poolandironwood_digestthroughzcash_sign_pcztValidation
py_compilefor the changed client and generated binding: passedStack
Base:
reconcile/upstream-sync.Protocol dependency: keepkey/device-protocol#113 (
f2246ce). This PR deliberately pins that exact upstream commit so python-keepkey and firmware test the same wire contract.