self-development: widen cross-spawner dedup and reduce focus area overlap

[kelos-bot]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

The four cron-based issue-creating agents each check gh issue list --label generated-by-kelos --limit 10 before creating issues, but the repository has 30+ open generated-by-kelos issues. This means agents miss most existing issues during dedup checks, leading to thematic overlap and wasted runs.

This PR makes three prompt-only changes to reduce duplicate issue creation:

1. Widen dedup search — Replace --limit 10 with --limit 50 --json number,title in kelos-fake-strategist, kelos-fake-user, and kelos-self-update so agents see all open generated-by-kelos issues (compact JSON output keeps context usage low)
2. Narrow focus areas — Remove "Workflow Improvements" from kelos-fake-strategist since it overlaps entirely with kelos-self-update's scope
3. Add cross-agent awareness — Add explicit notes to each agent's constraints listing which areas are owned by other agents, so they avoid creating overlapping issues

Change 3 from the issue (add spawner name to issue titles) is deferred to #549 per triage recommendation.

Which issue(s) this PR is related to:

Fixes #553

Special notes for your reviewer:

These are prompt-only changes to self-development TaskSpawner YAML files. No code changes, no CRD changes, no API changes.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

---

Summary by cubic

Reduces duplicate issue creation across cron agents by widening dedup checks and clarifying each agent’s scope. Fixes #553 by having agents review all open generated-by-kelos issues and avoid overlap.

• Refactors
  • Standardize dedup check to gh issue list --label generated-by-kelos --state open --limit 50 --json number,title in kelos-fake-strategist, kelos-fake-user, and kelos-self-update.
  • Remove “Workflow Improvements” from kelos-fake-strategist and update the README to match (owned by kelos-self-update).
  • Add cross-agent ownership notes in constraints to prevent overlap (strategist, fake-user, self-update, config-update).

^{Written for commit b5a49b9. Summary will update on new commits.}

[cubic-dev-ai]

4 issues found across 3 files

Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name="self-development/kelos-self-update.yaml">

<violation number="1" location="self-development/kelos-self-update.yaml:85">
P0: YAML indentation bug: this line is at 4-space indent, which exits the `promptTemplate: |` literal block scalar (whose key is also at 4 spaces). This will cause a YAML parse error at deploy time, as a sequence item (`-`) cannot appear directly inside the `taskTemplate` mapping. Indent to 6 spaces to keep this line inside the prompt template.</violation>
</file>

<file name="self-development/kelos-fake-user.yaml">

<violation number="1" location="self-development/kelos-fake-user.yaml:70">
P0: **YAML indentation bug**: This line has 4 spaces of indentation but should have 6 to remain inside the `promptTemplate: |` block scalar. As written, this line exits the block scalar and becomes an invalid YAML sequence item at the `taskTemplate` level, breaking the entire manifest with a parse error.</violation>
</file>

<file name="self-development/kelos-fake-strategist.yaml">

<violation number="1" location="self-development/kelos-fake-strategist.yaml:45">
P2: The README still lists "Workflow Improvements" as a focus area for kelos-fake-strategist (line 154 of `self-development/README.md`), but this PR removes that focus area. Update the README in the same PR to stay in sync.

(Based on your team's feedback about keeping documentation and config updated with changes.) [FEEDBACK_USED]</violation>

<violation number="2" location="self-development/kelos-fake-strategist.yaml:75">
P2: Indentation bug: this bullet has 4 spaces of indentation while all other Constraints bullets have 6 spaces. Since this is inside a `promptTemplate: |` literal block, the misaligned indentation is preserved verbatim in the prompt, making this bullet appear outside the Constraints list to the agent.</violation>
</file>

_{Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.}

[gjkim42]

fix the PR based on review comments
/reset-worker

[gjkim42]

/squash-commits