v4.1.1

Two verdicts the app was stating without the evidence behind them.

• Apple M5 Max is described correctly. That chip has no Efficiency cores — its perf levels are Super (6) and Performance (12) — and SiliconScope got it wrong four ways at once: a "6E+12P" header, "E-cores @ 0 MHz", a usage split taken from the wrong cores, and no CPU power at all. The header now reads "6 Super + 12 Performance", both clusters report their real DVFS ceilings, and the watts land on the right rows. Every other Mac is unchanged. (#30 — measured on real hardware by @ben0112)
• Which CPU belongs to which cluster is now read, not assumed. macOS publishes core counts per perf level but no ordering; that comes from the device tree. On M5 Max the top tier is the last six cores — the old assumption was wrong in direction, not just in label.
• A machine cooling down is no longer reported as throttled. After a heavy run, both cards outlined red while nothing was running: thermal pressure stays elevated while the fans spin, and every clock had dropped because nothing was asking for performance. Throttling now requires a die that is hot right now, and a GPU actually drawing power — 0.4 W on the minimum clock is idle, not held back.

Also

• sscope-cli --cpu-debug dumps the perf levels, the device-tree cluster map and every DVFS table present.
• The 80 °C / 95 °C thresholds are shared by the throttle detector and the temperature colours, so the app cannot disagree with itself about what "hot" means.