Value class params in expandable sentence#160
Merged
paul-brooks merged 2 commits intoJul 8, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks Michael, good find. Parser fix and tests look good. Turns out Poking at that revealed something better though: Going to merge this and put that on top as a follow-up, your parser change survives as is. Cheers. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Kensa fails to find methods annotated with
@ExpandableSentencewhen one or more of their parameters is a Kotlin value class:Very simple example that can trigger the problem:
The test output renders normally if you remove the
@ExpandableSentenceannotation, or change the parameter fromFootoString.The issue is that the Kotlin compiler will append a hash to the method name so that the JVM can distinguish between e.g.
fun someAction(param:Foo)andsomeAction(param:String)- the former's signature will appear to the JVM asvoid someAction-abc123(String param)- so we have to jump through a few hoops to get back to the original method name and parameter types.I've made changes to
CompilerPluginHookFunctionsandMethodParser, and made sure to keep more generic fallback methods, but let me know if you think there's a better approach.