Skip to content

Draft Ver 5.8.15

Choose a tag to compare

View all tags
@killerdevildog killerdevildog released this 18 May 22:38
v5.8.15
e4353ae

Draft Ver 5.8.15

This is the largest substantive release of Operation Checkmate since the initial bill drafting. Fourteen significant additions and modifications across Sections 1, 2, 5, 9, 11, 16, and 17, each closing a specific structural gap identified in the prior session's gap analysis. All cross-references resolve. No operative provision of any previously-existing subsection was modified except where noted (§1.1.18 bullet (b) and §16.5 first bullet).

Why this release

Prior gap analysis identified a series of structural weaknesses in the bill's architecture that would, if left unaddressed, allow the immunity gap, the discipline gap, and the enforcement gap the Act exists to close to reopen along procedural, definitional, or licensing lines. This release closes each of those gaps in turn, through the additions detailed below.

Section 1 — Definitions

§1.1.18 Ultra vires, bullet (b) — strengthened. The judicial-actor-performing-legislative-function bullet now explicitly enumerates new immunity doctrines among the conduct categories it reaches, and names Bradley v. Fisher (1872), Imbler v. Pachtman (1976), and Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982) by full citation as paradigm examples of legislative judicial action by an unelected judicial body. Cross-references the new §1.1.25.

§1.1.24 Substantial — new. Defines "substantial" (and substantially / substantive) as the operative-reality standard, not a formal-paperwork standard. A "review" that did not actually engage, an "investigation" that did not actually investigate, a "training" that did not actually train, a "hearing" that did not actually hear — none are substantial. Applies bidirectionally: a government actor's claim of "substantial compliance / review / investigation / procedure" must be tested against the operative-reality standard. Ambiguity resolved in favor of the citizen per §1.1.5.2.

§1.1.25 Legislate from the Bench (Judicial Legislation) — new. Standalone substantive offense, Class 1 felony, escalating to capital where the legislative judicial action involved creating, extending, or applying an immunity doctrine shielding government-actor misconduct from liability under this Act. Five per se categories enumerated (immunity-doctrine creation/extension/application, with Harlow, Bradley, Imbler named as paradigm examples; new offense/duty/right creation by pronouncement; new exception/carve-out without textual basis; doctrinal expansion beyond statute or text; substantive policy-making framed as procedural decision). Three lawful categories preserved (faithful application; good-faith interpretation — "Interpretation is permitted; invention is not"; precedent within actual reasoning). Defenses explicitly limited.

Section 2 — Due Process

§2.8.3A Mandatory Recording, Preservation, and Citizen Access — new. The affirmative-mandate counterpart to §2.8.3 (Unrecorded Enforcement Contact). Every peace officer / deputy / detention officer / investigator / code-enforcement officer / SRO must be equipped, must activate at earliest practicable moment, must maintain continuous recording. Preservation: minimum 7 years; cryptographic integrity verification; no editing/deletion except per defined exceptions. Citizen access rights: 10 business days for any subject/affected citizen on request, 72 hours when citizen is subject of a related proceeding, no filing fee, no lawyer requirement. Entity-level liability for failure to equip/maintain/enforce/preserve.

§2.8.7A Involuntary Commitment and Court-Ordered Evaluation Abuse — new. Conceptual mirror of §2.8.7 (Crisis-Response Misconduct). §2.8.7 reaches over-criminalization; §2.8.7A reaches over-medicalization for silencing, retaliation, or neutralization. Six specific patterns named (whistleblower neutralization, family-court weaponization, retaliation for protected conduct, extended hold without medical necessity, evaluation-as-harassment, coerced waiver via threatened commitment). Class 2 felony; capital where confinement exceeds 7 days, psychoactive medication against objection, loss of employment/housing/custody/license, coerced waiver, or lasting psychiatric labeling.

§2.10.8 Civil Contempt Indefinite Confinement Abuse — new. Operative principle: civil contempt power exists only to coerce compliance with a lawful order the contemnor has present ability to comply with — "the contemnor must carry the keys to the jailhouse in their own pocket." Specifically names family-court / child-support-court abuse: "A citizen confined for inability to pay child support, where the court has not made a current finding of present ability to pay, is being detained for debt — not held in lawful civil contempt — and the responsible judicial officer is reachable under this subsection." Class 2 felony; capital at 30+ days without current ability-to-comply finding, detention for inability to pay alone, or use to silence/retaliate/coerce waiver.

§2.13 Training and Competency Requirements — new. Preparation-side companion to §1.1.20 (Citizen-Prompted Oath Recitation). Annual training (minimum 8 hours) for every government actor subject to the Act, from a qualified independent provider, covering Act provisions, the oath, Supremacy Clause, US/Utah Constitution, §1.1.5 rights, and citizen mechanisms. Failure to complete = temporary incapacity from exercising office until completed; acts during incapacity reachable under §1.1.10 + §1.1.18. Entity-level liability for failure to provide. Training-provider standards with Office of the Governor approved-provider list.

Section 5 — Liability and Penalty Architecture

§5.8 No Statute of Limitations for Criminal Offenses Under This Act — new. Operative rule: "No statute of limitations shall bar the prosecution of any criminal offense defined in this Act." Reason: "A statute of limitations that begins to run from the date of the conduct rewards the most successful concealment with the most certain immunity. This Act will not provide that reward." Constitutional precision: extending an unexpired limitations period is procedural and constitutional (Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632–33 (2003)); conduct already time-barred under prior law on the effective date remains reachable under Section 10 civil retroactivity.

§5.9 Pretrial Release, Bail, and Conditions of Release for Officials Charged Under This Act — new. Standing pretrial rules addressing the unusual flight and obstruction risks of charged government actors. Mandatory conditions by operation of law: surrender of badge / credentials / firearm / agency equipment at first appearance; suspension of agency access and official authority; no-contact orders; prohibition on agency resources for personal defense. Rebuttable presumption of pretrial detention for capital and Class 1 felony charges. Monetary bail not primary; agency/union/public funds cannot post bail. Unpaid administrative leave pending trial. Standing firearms-surrender condition for any force/threat/custodial/coercion offense.

Section 9 — Activation of Prosecution / Citizen Council

§9.16 Conflict, Recusal, and Special Prosecutor Rules — new. Closes the local-prosecutor-capture vulnerability. Substitute chain: (1) Utah Attorney General → (2) adjacent county prosecutor selected by Council → (3) Council-appointed special prosecutor compensated from §11 forfeited funds. Plea limits: substitute/special prosecutors cannot plead capital offenses down below felony classification without on-the-record Council concurrence (closes back-end discretion loophole). Failure of the chain triggers emergency assignment by Utah Supreme Court within 90 days, with SCt failure itself reachable under §1.1.8 + §1.1.10.

Section 11 — Forfeiture of State Benefits and Office

§11.4 Automatic Decertification, Disbarment, and Removal from Professional Standing — new. Closes the parallel-licensing-track vulnerability. POST decertification (peace officers): 30 days to refer, 90 days for POST to act, failure to act = automatic decertification by operation of law on day 91, National Decertification Index transmission. Bar disbarment (prosecutors and attorneys): same timeline, ABA National Lawyer Regulatory Data Bank transmission. Judicial Conduct Commission removal (judges): same timeline, with day-91 automatic recommendation of removal. Other licensed professionals (social workers, public guardians, medical examiners, court-appointed evaluators, probation/parole officers, notaries, public-health officers, building inspectors): same rules. §11.4.5 Licensing-Body Capture: Citizen Council jurisdiction to investigate licensing-body failures; obstructing licensing-body members are themselves reachable as government actors.

Section 16 — Nullity of Repugnant Instruments

§16.5 first bullet — rewritten to capture direct or indirect conflict.

  • Old (direct contradiction only): "It directly contradicts a provision of this Act, the Utah Constitution, or the U.S. Constitution"
  • New (direct or indirect operative conflict): an instrument is repugnant where it directly or indirectly creates a conflict — a direct conflict where the instrument on its face mandates conduct the higher authority prohibits or vice versa, an indirect conflict where in its enforcement, application, effect, or interaction with other government instruments it produces an outcome inconsistent with the higher authority. "Both forms of conflict are reachable under this Section, and the test is the operative effect of the instrument against the operative authority of the higher source, not the formal language alone."

Closes the workaround vulnerability for instruments crafted to look constitutional on their face while operating unconstitutionally in effect.

Section 17 — Role-Specific Public Official Offenses

§17.24F Public Health Emergency Authority Abuse — new. Reaches seven distinct circumstances of abuse (no evidence-based justification; exceeds scope / invades another branch / bill-of-attainder; enforced beyond actual duration; selective enforcement; conditions livelihood/employment/business/family/religion/§1.1.5 rights on submission; material misrepresentation or undisclosed conflicts; extended without notice/hearing/judicial review). Specifically named patterns: quarantine orders, business closure orders, employment-conditioning orders (vaccination/testing/masking-as-employment-condition), indefinite emergency extension, bypass of legislative process, public misrepresentation, undisclosed financial conflict. Class 2 felony; Class 1 where abuse caused loss of livelihood / business closure / family separation / denial of religious worship / denial of unrelated medical care / material welfare harm; capital where malicious, retaliatory, sustained beyond reasonable correction notice, or coordinated.

§17.24G Election Authority Abuse — new. Reaches nine forms of election-administration misconduct (voter-roll purges without basis or selectively applied; registration tampering / selective scrutiny; ballot rejection / counting delay; certification refusal; partisan poll-worker conduct; timing manipulation; retaliatory enforcement against voters / candidates / observers / whistleblowers; record falsification or destruction; coordinated conduct). Class 2 felony; Class 1 at 50+ voters/ballots/transactions; capital where outcome-affecting or intended to affect outcome.

Doctrinal anchors

The substantive offenses in this release rest on, and are consistent with, the following sources:

  • Supreme Court immunity-creation cases named in §1.1.18 and §1.1.25: Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335 (1872); Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976); Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982); plus Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978); Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9 (1991); Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967); Jessop v. City of Fresno, 936 F.3d 937 (9th Cir. 2019).
  • Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003) — anchoring the constitutional precision of §5.8 (no SOL for unexpired limitations; civil retroactivity only for already-expired conduct).
  • Federal POST / National Decertification Index — operational anchor for §11.4.1 decertification reciprocity.
  • ABA National Lawyer Regulatory Data Bank — operational anchor for §11.4.2 disbarment reciprocity.
  • Utah Peace Officer Standards and Training Council, Utah State Bar Office of Professional Conduct, Utah Judicial Conduct Commission — the three principal Utah licensing bodies whose timely action §11.4 obligates and whose inaction §11.4 backstops with day-91 automatic-discipline rules.

This release represents the bill's substantive architecture at maturity. Future releases are expected to focus on remaining moderate-impact gaps (election-official misconduct deepening; coroner / medical examiner offenses; surveillance-technology specifics; tribal-state jurisdiction questions; sunset / mandatory review clause; funding mechanism / fiscal note), drafting cleanup, and the master offenses index. The core architecture — immunity abrogation (§5.1), substantive offenses (Sections 1, 2, 17), Citizen Council enforcement (§9), entity-level reach (§5.7, §1.1.21–§1.1.23), forfeiture and decertification consequences (§11), nullity of repugnant instruments (§16), no-SOL on the criminal side (§5.8), retroactive civil applicability (§10) — is now substantially complete.

Assets 3
Loading