Skip to content

Conversation

@davidxia
Copy link
Contributor

@davidxia davidxia commented Nov 14, 2018

DO NOT MERGE. FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidxia
To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers.
We suggest the following additional approver: brendandburns

If they are not already assigned, you can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @brendandburns in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 14, 2018
@davidxia davidxia changed the title Show that Objects.deepEquals() does not fix V1Secret.equals() DO NOT MERGE: Show that Objects.deepEquals() does not fix V1Secret.equals() Nov 14, 2018
@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this since it was for demo purposes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants