Skip to content

Conversation

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member

@tenzen-y tenzen-y commented Mar 20, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

As we discussed in #4646, we want to mention what happens if nodeTains and tolerations are specified in the same ResourceFlavor.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #4646

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. labels Mar 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 20, 2025
@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member Author

/hold
until v0.11.0

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Mar 20, 2025
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ef1b992
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/68131416131a9b00084ce780
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4704--kubernetes-sigs-kueue.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 21, 2025
Comment on lines 66 to 67
// When this ResourceFlavor has corresponding .spec.tolerations as those nodeTaints,
// nodeTaints are not considered during admission.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// When this ResourceFlavor has corresponding .spec.tolerations as those nodeTaints,
// nodeTaints are not considered during admission.
// When this ResourceFlavor has also set the matching tolerations (in .spec.tolerations),
// then the nodeTaints are not considered during admission.

nit, proposal

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, that sounds good to me.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 27, 2025
@mbobrovskyi
Copy link
Contributor

@tenzen-y Could you please rebase?

@tenzen-y tenzen-y force-pushed the add-rf-nodetaints-couple-specifications branch from ba14352 to d98fd2f Compare May 1, 2025 06:19
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 1, 2025
…ations to documentation

Signed-off-by: Yuki Iwai <yuki.iwai.tz@gmail.com>

# Conflicts:
#	site/content/en/docs/concepts/resource_flavor.md
@tenzen-y tenzen-y force-pushed the add-rf-nodetaints-couple-specifications branch from d98fd2f to ef1b992 Compare May 1, 2025 06:26
@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member Author

tenzen-y commented May 1, 2025

@mbobrovskyi I addressed @mimowo comments, and resolve conflicts, thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@mbobrovskyi mbobrovskyi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mbobrovskyi, tenzen-y

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 1, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: 14d8e1f0c1fc7a5c6bec31af7ff7895c156f0f25

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member Author

tenzen-y commented May 1, 2025

/cherry-pick website

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tenzen-y: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of website in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick website

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 77ce7b1 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 1, 2025
22 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.12 milestone May 1, 2025
@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tenzen-y: new pull request created: #5146

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick website

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RF nodeTaints do not work well couple with RF tolerations

5 participants