Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PreferSameNode Traffic Distribution (formerly PreferLocal traffic policy / Node-level topology) #3015

Open
1 of 4 tasks
danwinship opened this issue Oct 21, 2021 · 32 comments
Assignees
Labels
lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team
Milestone

Comments

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

danwinship commented Oct 21, 2021

PerferSameNode Traffic Distribution (formerly Node-level topology (formerly PreferLocal traffic policy))

Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Oct 21, 2021
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/sig network

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 21, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 19, 2022
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 20, 2022
@thockin thockin added this to the v1.24 milestone Jan 20, 2022
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

Given the discussion on #3016 I think we want to drop this from 1.24 but keep it open (for now)

@danwinship danwinship changed the title PreferLocal traffic policy PreferLocal traffic policy / Node-level topology May 3, 2022
@Priyankasaggu11929 Priyankasaggu11929 removed this from the v1.24 milestone May 10, 2022
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 8, 2022
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 15, 2022
@thockin thockin self-assigned this Sep 29, 2022
@thockin thockin added the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Sep 29, 2022
@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Sep 29, 2022

Candidate for Alpha in 1.26

@rhockenbury
Copy link

/milestone v1.26
/label tracked/yes
/remove-label tracked/no
/stage alpha

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label Sep 30, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhockenbury: Those labels are not set on the issue: tracked/no

In response to this:

/milestone v1.26
/label tracked/yes
/remove-label tracked/no
/stage alpha

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Sep 30, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.26 milestone Sep 30, 2022
@jukie
Copy link

jukie commented Jan 19, 2024

@thockin was your ref to project 148 a typo by chance? Was interested in seeing how a similar design is being implemented in the new KEP or project.

@thockin
Copy link
Member

thockin commented Jan 24, 2024

@robscott and @gauravkghildiyal are cooking an update to topology which gives us some of this, but (IIRC) not the PreferLocal policy. Is that right guys? Help is welcome..

@gauravkghildiyal
Copy link
Member

Thanks for CC'ing!

Yes that's about right. The current thought is to start with support for PreferZone only (while still allowing scope for supporting PreferLocal in the future, pending some discussion)

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

reopening as TrafficDistribution: PreferSameNode

@danwinship danwinship reopened this Feb 6, 2025
@danwinship danwinship changed the title PreferLocal traffic policy / Node-level topology PreferSameNode Traffic Distribution (formerly PreferLocal traffic policy / Node-level topology) Feb 6, 2025
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label lead-opted-in
/milestone v1.33

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.33 milestone Feb 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Feb 6, 2025
@thockin thockin moved this from Withdrawn to Pre-Alpha in SIG Network KEPs Feb 6, 2025
@jenshu
Copy link

jenshu commented Feb 7, 2025

Hello @danwinship @thockin 👋, v1.33 Enhancements team here.

Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 14th February 2025 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 13th February 2025.

This enhancement is targeting stage alpha for v1.33 (correct me, if otherwise)

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • KEP readme using the latest template has been merged into the k/enhancements repo.
  • KEP status is marked as implementable for latest-milestone: v1.33.
  • KEP readme has up-to-date graduation criteria
  • KEP has a production readiness review that has been completed and merged into k/enhancements. (For more information on the PRR process, check here). If your production readiness review is not completed yet, please make sure to fill the production readiness questionnaire in your KEP by the PRR Freeze deadline on Thursday 6th February 2025 so that the PRR team has enough time to review your KEP.

For this KEP, we would just need to update the following:

  • The readme, kep.yaml, and PRR yaml all need to be merged. I see that you have a PR open that addresses all these, so we should be good once it merges!

The status of this enhancement is marked as At risk for enhancements freeze. Please keep the issue description up-to-date with appropriate stages as well.

If you anticipate missing enhancements freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you!

@jenshu jenshu moved this to At risk for enhancements freeze in 1.33 Enhancements Tracking Feb 7, 2025
@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hi @danwinship 👋, 1.33 Enhancements team here,

Just a quick friendly reminder as we approach the enhancements freeze later this week, at 02:00 UTC Friday 14th February 2025 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 13th February 2025.

The current status of this enhancement is marked as At risk for enhancement freeze. There are a few requirements mentioned in the comment #3015 (comment) that still need to be completed.

If you anticipate missing enhancements freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you!

@jenshu
Copy link

jenshu commented Feb 13, 2025

Hello @danwinship @thockin 👋, v1.33 Enhancements team here.

With all the requirements fulfilled, this enhancement is now marked as tracked for the upcoming enhancements freeze 🚀

@jenshu jenshu moved this from At risk for enhancements freeze to Tracked for enhancements freeze in 1.33 Enhancements Tracking Feb 13, 2025
@jenshu jenshu added the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Feb 13, 2025
@ArvindParekh
Copy link
Member

Hello, @thockin 👋, v1.33 Docs Shadow here.

Does this enhancement work planned for v1.33 require any new docs or modifications to existing docs?

If so, please follow the steps here to open a PR against the dev-1.33 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday 27th February 2025 18:00 PDT.

Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarized with the docs requirement for the release.

Thank you!

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign

@rayandas
Copy link
Member

Hi @thockin 👋 v1.33 Docs Lead here.

Gentle reminder! The deadline to raise a placeholder Docs PR is Thursday 27th February 2025 18:00 PDT.
If this enhancement work requires any new docs or modification to existing docs, please create a placeholder PR (it can be a draft PR for now) before the deadline.

Thanks!

@aakankshabhende
Copy link
Member

Hi @danwinship 👋 -- this is Aakanksha (@aakankshabhende ) from the 1.33 Communications Team!

For the 1.33 release, we are currently in the process of collecting and curating a list of potential feature blogs, and we'd love for you to consider writing one for your enhancement!

As you may be aware, feature blogs are a great way to communicate to users about features which fall into (but not limited to) the following categories:

  • This introduces some breaking change(s)
  • This has significant impacts and/or implications to users
  • ...Or this is a long-awaited feature, which would go a long way to cover the journey more in detail 🎉

To opt in to write a feature blog, could you please let us know and open a "Feature Blog placeholder PR" (which can be only a skeleton at first) against the website repository by Wednesday, 5th March, 2025? For more information about writing a blog, please find the blog contribution guidelines 📚

Tip

Some timeline to keep in mind:

  • 02:00 UTC Wednesday, 5th March, 2025: Feature blog PR freeze
  • Monday, 7th April, 2025: Feature blogs ready for review
  • You can find more in the release document

Note

In your placeholder PR, use XX characters for the blog date in the front matter and file name. We will work with you on updating the PR with the publication date once we have a final number of feature blogs for this release.

@aakankshabhende
Copy link
Member

Hi @danwinship 👋 -- this is Aakanksha (@aakankshabhende ) from 1.33 Communications Team here again!

This is a gentle reminder for the feature blog deadline mentioned above, which is 02:00 UTC Wednesday, 5th March, 2025. To opt in, please let us know and open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against k/website by the deadline. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to us!

Tip

Some timeline to keep in mind:

  • 02:00 UTC Wednesday, 5th March, 2025: Feature blog PR freeze
  • Monday, 7th April, 2025: Feature blogs ready for review
  • You can find more in the release document

Note

In your placeholder PR, use XX characters for the blog date in the front matter and file name. We will work with you on updating the PR with the publication date once we have a final number of feature blogs for this release.

@ArkaSaha30
Copy link
Member

Hey again @danwinship 👋, v1.33 Enhancements team here,

Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 02:00 UTC Friday 21st March 2025 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 20th March 2025.

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • All PRs to the Kubernetes repo that are related to your enhancement are linked in the above issue description (for tracking purposes).
  • All PRs are ready to be merged (they have approved and lgtm labels applied) by the code freeze deadline. This includes tests.

For this enhancement, it looks like the 0 PRs have been updated in the issue description. We need to update the Issue description to include all the related PRs of this KEP.
Please let me know if there are any PRs in k/k we should be tracking for this KEP.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance.

The status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for code freeze.

@ArkaSaha30 ArkaSaha30 moved this from Tracked for enhancements freeze to At risk for code freeze in 1.33 Enhancements Tracking Mar 4, 2025
@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hi @danwinship 👋, v1.33 Enhancements team here,

Just a quick friendly reminder as we approach the code freeze later this week, at 02:00 UTC Friday 21st March 2025 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 20th March 2025.

The current status of this enhancement is marked as At risk for code freeze. There are a few requirements mentioned in the comment #3015 (comment) that still need to be completed.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team
Projects
Status: Net New
Status: At risk for code freeze
Status: Pre-Alpha
Development

No branches or pull requests