Update feature gates (English) via automation by singh1203 · Pull Request #53847 · kubernetes/website

singh1203 · 2025-12-29T07:07:47Z

Description

Syncs all feature gate .md files with Kubernetes

Generated using: ./scripts/releng/update-feature-gates.sh ../featuregates.json

Depends on (merge AFTER):

Issue

Closes:

k8s-ci-robot · 2025-12-29T07:07:53Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sayakmukhopadhyay for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

content/en/docs/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

singh1203 · 2025-12-29T07:13:43Z

cc: @dipesh-rawat @lmktfy

singh1203 · 2025-12-29T07:16:22Z

Are checks failing due to my changes?
I don't think so https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/695228c6671767000820d9c3#L17

lmktfy

Thank you for the PR.

To make this build, try a couple of changes:

omit all the new feature gates where there is a TODO in the description
(save those for a future pull request)
don't have a stable stage starting at version 1.0 for feature gates that were introduced as deprecated; see AllowDNSOnlyNodeCSR for an example of this

If you preview the changes locally you can see if there are any build errors.
If there are, it's OK to ask for advice about addressing them.

Signed-off-by: Saurabh Kumar Singh <singh1203.ss@gmail.com>

singh1203 · 2026-01-17T16:43:14Z

Thank you for the PR.

To make this build, try a couple of changes:

omit all the new feature gates where there is a TODO in the description
(save those for a future pull request)

don't have a stable stage starting at version 1.0 for feature gates that were introduced as deprecated; see AllowDNSOnlyNodeCSR for an example of this

If you preview the changes locally you can see if there are any build errors. If there are, it's OK to ask for advice about addressing them.

Updated this PR to include only feature gates tracked in versioned_feature_list.yaml from k/k

Changes:

Removed placeholder feature gates with FIXME/TODO descriptions
Kept only gates with existing documentation that received front matter updates
Verified locally with make container-serve - build succeeds ✅

New feature gates requiring descriptions will be handled in a separate PR with proper context.
@lmktfy thank you for guidance and feedback 🙇

netlify · 2026-01-17T16:43:48Z

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	`4688f36`
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/696bb9fe9276cb0008f38b64
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-53847--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

lmktfy · 2026-01-17T20:17:14Z

/retitle Update feature gates (English) via automation

lmktfy

/lgtm

Even though this PR introduces one new error, the overall changes represent a big improvement.

lmktfy · 2026-01-17T20:18:22Z

@@ -1,14 +1,12 @@
 ---
 title: PodReadyToStartContainersCondition
-former_titles:


Try to keep this, unless you can show that former_titles metadata isn't actually used.

lmktfy · 2026-01-17T20:20:45Z

    toVersion: "1.33"
  - stage: stable
    defaultValue: true
-    locked: false


I would keep this, but for that we ought to first update the generator code.

Okay! Will keep it

lmktfy · 2026-01-17T20:21:49Z

+  - stage: alpha
    defaultValue: false
-    fromVersion: "1.30"
+    fromVersion: "1.32"


This change is incorrect. Read the text to see why.

Well, for MutatingAdmissionPolicy are you referring to the "existed but no effect" text for v1.30-1.31?

Also YAML shows Alpha from v1.32. So should we use YAML exactly and manually adjust or add logic to preserve historical ranges?

If the upstream data are wrong, let's fix it in k/k so that the generated update comes out correct.

This feature gate was available to set in Kubernetes 1.30 and Kubernetes 1.31 and I would be very wary to change what we say retrospectively. The docs were already correct.

I investigated MutatingAdmissionPolicy in k/k, and the v1.30/v1.31 history here was deliberately adjusted so the recorded lifecycle starts at v1.32. Since that change is intentional upstream, do you still want to fix it in k/k so that the generated update comes out correct?

k8s-ci-robot · 2026-01-17T20:22:48Z

LGTM label has been added.

Details

Git tree hash: a1530a875ef8f42edd5b3bf1a9d21cf5537ac8fa

divya-mohan0209 · 2026-02-09T02:29:26Z

@singh1203 : Please advise if you'd be able to address comments by @sftim ?

singh1203 · 2026-02-15T18:13:20Z

@singh1203 : Please advise if you'd be able to address comments by @sftim ?

Yes, I'm working on it and need some clarification, as I mentioned in the reply to @lmktfy's comment.

k8s-ci-robot · 2026-04-23T19:04:57Z

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

k8s-ci-robot requested a review from SayakMukhopadhyay December 29, 2025 07:07

k8s-ci-robot added the language/en Issues or PRs related to English language label Dec 29, 2025

k8s-ci-robot requested a review from shannonxtreme December 29, 2025 07:07

k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 29, 2025

lmktfy reviewed Jan 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

Update feature gate markdown files based on versioned_feature_list.yaml

4688f36

Signed-off-by: Saurabh Kumar Singh <singh1203.ss@gmail.com>

singh1203 force-pushed the gen_reference_feature_gates_markdown branch from 6e7e5e8 to 4688f36 Compare January 17, 2026 16:34

k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 17, 2026

k8s-ci-robot changed the title ~~Added all feature gates docs via genfeaturegates utility~~ Update feature gates (English) via automation Jan 17, 2026

lmktfy reviewed Jan 17, 2026

View reviewed changes

k8s-ci-robot assigned lmktfy Jan 17, 2026

k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 17, 2026

singh1203 mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2026

REQUEST: New membership for singh1203 kubernetes/org#6073

Closed

11 tasks

k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 23, 2026

Conversation

singh1203 commented Dec 29, 2025

Description

Issue

Uh oh!

k8s-ci-robot commented Dec 29, 2025

Uh oh!

singh1203 commented Dec 29, 2025

Uh oh!

singh1203 commented Dec 29, 2025

Uh oh!

lmktfy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

singh1203 commented Jan 17, 2026

Uh oh!

netlify Bot commented Jan 17, 2026

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Uh oh!

lmktfy commented Jan 17, 2026

Uh oh!

lmktfy left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

lmktfy Apr 21, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 17, 2026

Uh oh!

divya-mohan0209 commented Feb 9, 2026

Uh oh!

singh1203 commented Feb 15, 2026

Uh oh!

k8s-ci-robot commented Apr 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

lmktfy left a comment •

edited

Loading

lmktfy Apr 21, 2026 •

edited

Loading