Skip to content

Sparse-query control: complete comparison, failed 14/16 rule

Choose a tag to compare

@kw2828 kw2828 released this 23 Sep 03:40
· 175 commits to main since this release

Completed the fixed sparse-query comparison: 24 calibration paths and 360 evaluation paths across five controllers and three sensing settings. All evaluation searches succeeded. Period-two querying cut fully paid controller cost by 53.15% / 40.79% versus always-neural control in the primary settings, but failed two move-quality requirements. The prespecified continuation rule is FAIL, 14/16; no new model or architecture advantage is claimed.

The archive preserves every trajectory, compressed journal, all 114 scientific sources, all engineering attempts and both saved audits. The first audit had a dictionary-versus-scalar timing check bug. A separately frozen corrected verifier agrees with the unchanged data and criteria. Both figure versions and all values remain available. Extract at the repository root; this archive does not include the runtime or eleven inherited model/kernel/prior-evidence dependencies listed in the manifest.

Results and chart · Protocol · Audit correction