Skip to content

Apply as Kyerno reviewer#57

Merged
realshuting merged 3 commits intokyverno:mainfrom
yrsuthari:feature/add_reviewer
Sep 3, 2025
Merged

Apply as Kyerno reviewer#57
realshuting merged 3 commits intokyverno:mainfrom
yrsuthari:feature/add_reviewer

Conversation

@yrsuthari
Copy link
Contributor

@yrsuthari yrsuthari commented Aug 12, 2025

Hi Kyverno Maintainers,

I would like to be considered for the Kyverno Reviewer role. Over the past several release cycles I’ve contributed across multiple areas, with a strong focus on CEL-based policies, observability, and developer experience improvements.

Key Contribution Areas

CEL-based policy enhancements:

  • Fixed brittle failure cases in CEL global context handling (#13344).

  • Improved validation and exception handling logic for CEL-driven policies.

  • Added resilience and test coverage for missing or null values in CEL evaluations.

Policy Exceptions & Enforcement Flexibility

  • Designed and implemented fine-grained PolicyExceptions supporting image-based and value-based exceptions with configurable reporting modes (#13662
    , #13585).

  • Added DeferEnforce validation mode to enable layered enforcement strategies (#12594).

Observability & Reliability:

  • Strengthened error handling and logging consistency across controllers (#13415
    , #13413).

  • Introduced new OpenTelemetry metrics and semantic tracing for deeper visibility into Kyverno internals (#13585).

  • Improved PolicyReport generation to correctly reference mutated target resources instead of trigger resources (#13339).

Developer & User Experience:

  • Fixed Helm chart drift issues by ensuring deterministic ordering of imagePullSecrets (#12999).

Improved CLI behavior and documentation:

  • Proper handling of expected failures in CLI test runs (#12593).

  • Completed and corrected CLI docs URLs (#13300
    , #13841).

  • Fixed broken links across the docs to improve accessibility (#13840).

Reliability Improvements:

  • Sanitized event names to comply with RFC 1123 and prevent admission failures (#12693).

  • Enhanced logging timestamp format handling (#12557).

kyverno/kyverno#13415
kyverno/kyverno#13413
kyverno/kyverno#13344
kyverno/kyverno#13300
kyverno/kyverno#12999
kyverno/kyverno#12693
kyverno/kyverno#12557
kyverno/kyverno#13585
kyverno/kyverno#13662
kyverno/kyverno#13339
kyverno/kyverno#12594
kyverno/kyverno#12593
kyverno/kyverno#13841
kyverno/kyverno#13840

I would like to be considered for the Reviewer role with a focus on CEL policies. My contributions include improvements to CEL policy execution and exceptions, and I have also worked on applying Kyverno for compliance through the CNCF EKS CIS blog
and the cis-eks-kyverno project. I am interested in supporting the community by reviewing CEL-related features and enhancements.

@realshuting
Copy link
Member

/vote

@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Sep 3, 2025

Vote created

@realshuting has called for a vote on Apply as Kyerno reviewer (#57).

The members of the following teams have binding votes:

Team
@kyverno/binding-votes

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor Against Abstain
👍 👎 👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 7days. It will pass if at least 50% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

@realshuting realshuting merged commit 1a63299 into kyverno:main Sep 3, 2025
1 check passed
@realshuting
Copy link
Member

/check

@realshuting
Copy link
Member

We seem to have some issues with the vote-bot, it should block the PR until the vote passes.

I'm reverting it and will start a new vote.

realshuting added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
realshuting added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
@git-vote
Copy link

git-vote bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Vote closed

The vote passed! 🎉

50.00% of the users with binding vote were in favor and 0.00% were against (passing threshold: 50%).

Summary

In favor Against Abstain Not voted
6 0 0 6

Binding votes (6)

User Vote Timestamp
@JimBugwadia In favor 2025-09-03 13:51:46.0 +00:00:00
@Jonas-Beck In favor 2025-09-03 9:23:26.0 +00:00:00
@aerosouund In favor 2025-09-03 10:03:01.0 +00:00:00
@eddycharly In favor 2025-09-03 9:07:28.0 +00:00:00
@fjogeleit In favor 2025-09-03 9:09:39.0 +00:00:00
@realshuting In favor 2025-09-03 9:06:48.0 +00:00:00

Non-binding votes (1)

User Vote Timestamp
@CortNick In favor 2025-09-03 10:03:13.0 +00:00:00

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants