[13.x] Use Stringable::explode() instead of new Collection(explode()) - #60979
Merged
Merged
Conversation
lucasmichot
changed the title
Replaces new Collection(explode(...)) / Collection::wrap(explode(...)) / collect(explode(...)) with (new Stringable(...))->explode(...), which does the same thing internally but reads as string-splitting rather than array-wrapping.
lucasmichot
force-pushed
the
fix/explode-via-stringable
branch
from
August 2, 2026 15:18
7adfae2 to
c09de17
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replaces
new Collection(explode(...)),Collection::wrap(explode(...)), andcollect(explode(...))with(new Stringable(...))->explode(...)across 17 files. Same underlying behavior, reads as splitting a string rather than wrapping an array.