fix: preserve expected types of nested proofs#14557
Draft
kernelpanic888 wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
|
Mathlib CI status (docs):
|
Collaborator
|
Reference manual CI status:
|
leanprover-bot
added a commit
to leanprover/reference-manual
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR preserves the expected application-domain type when abstracting nested proof terms, preventing simplification from leaking an unfolded implementation type into the generated auxiliary theorem.
The nested-proof traversal now propagates each function domain as the expected type of the corresponding argument. The public
abstractProofAPI remains unchanged.Closes #14467
Tests
build/14467-reuse/stage1/bin/lean tests/lean/simpHoistedProof.leangit diff --check