docs: rewrite README problem section for clarity#43
Merged
Conversation
Tighten the problem statement from three paragraphs to three explicit bullets covering the actual reasons users reach for ERD Studio over existing tools: dbt-ERD sync drift, lack of per-domain dbt tagging for independent refresh schedules, and SqlDBM-style tools not being AI-readable. Plainer language for non-technical readers. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
dbtprominent.Test plan
README.mdpreview and confirm the new problem section flows into the existing "## The solution" heading🤖 Generated with Claude Code