Skip to content

Conversation

@bernstei
Copy link
Contributor

Fix very subtle bug in remote jobs with an op that takes a ConfigSet as its basic input, rather than an Atoms object.

The subtlety of this bug feels like a bad sign for the overall design, but the tiny fix suggests maybe it's OK

closes #349

as its basic input, rather than an Atoms object
@bernstei bernstei force-pushed the remote_op_with_configset_input branch from ac915d0 to bdbd700 Compare February 13, 2025 15:23
@bernstei bernstei force-pushed the remote_op_with_configset_input branch 2 times, most recently from f1c20ad to f3e1eec Compare February 19, 2025 16:24
@bernstei
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like pwscf on these containers is broken, but since the tests pass on my machine, I'm going to merge if that's the only failure, and I'll open a different issue for fixing pw.x.

@bernstei bernstei merged commit ec4899d into main Feb 19, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

combining couple of operations in one remote submission job

2 participants