Skip to content

A few more minor improvements for multi-step RBParameters objects#3575

Merged
jwpeterson merged 2 commits intolibMesh:develfrom
jwpeterson:drop_n_steps_max
Jun 2, 2023
Merged

A few more minor improvements for multi-step RBParameters objects#3575
jwpeterson merged 2 commits intolibMesh:develfrom
jwpeterson:drop_n_steps_max

Conversation

@jwpeterson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The fix in libMesh#3571 makes this check unnecessary, since RBParameters
objects with no parameters report having one step now.
Now that we have the possibility of multi-step RBParameters objects,
the advice given in the previous deprecation message is no longer
accurate, since it is not efficient to iterate over hundreds (or
possibly thousands) of steps just to get the list of parameter names.
@jwpeterson jwpeterson requested a review from dknez June 2, 2023 19:07
@moosebuild
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Job Coverage on 0118689 wanted to post the following:

Coverage

691f17 #3575 011868
Total Total +/- New
Rate 60.24% 60.24% +0.00% 0.00%
Hits 49398 49399 +1 0
Misses 32606 32606 - 2

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

Warnings

  • New new line coverage rate 0.00% is less than the suggested 90.0%

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@jwpeterson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

This is the second time in recent testing that I've seen:

FAIL mesh/preparedness.test FAILED (ERRMSG)

fail in debug mode. I don't think it's related to this PR but @roystgnr or @lindsayad might want to have a closer look at that one.

@jwpeterson jwpeterson merged commit e8f0b6c into libMesh:devel Jun 2, 2023
@jwpeterson jwpeterson deleted the drop_n_steps_max branch June 5, 2023 11:30
@roystgnr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

roystgnr commented Jun 5, 2023

That failure was BCID data out of sync between processors. Definitely unrelated to this PR, and definitely concerning. I'm seeing if I can replicate it.

@roystgnr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

roystgnr commented Jun 5, 2023

Well, that wasn't too hard. Running METHOD=dbg ./run_tests --re preparedness -p 2 with https://github.com/idaholab/moose/tree/968eb46a3868f624d7930083ffdedd039b3d4fd5 locally I hit that failure nearly 25% of the time.

@jwpeterson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

75% of the time, it works every time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants