fuzz: add chanmon holder signer fuzz ops#4660
Open
joostjager wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer! |
Allow chanmon consistency inputs to block and later unblock holder-side signing operations. This lets focused force-close fuzzing reuse the signer-op machinery without carrying the larger mining and settlement model.
994d779 to
ba0e4c5
Compare
Collaborator
|
I've thoroughly reviewed the entire PR diff, examining:
I verified that:
No issues found. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allow chanmon consistency inputs to block and later unblock holder-side signing operations. This lets focused force-close fuzzing reuse the signer-op machinery without carrying the larger mining and settlement model.
I split this out ahead of the broader force-close fuzzing work so we can review the signer-op modeling independently. The main question is whether these holder-side unblock actions are worth spending dedicated chanmon consistency opcodes on, or whether we should keep the opcode surface smaller and rely on final cleanup to re-enable them.