docs(ai): consolidate canonical ai/* sources (#64)#461
Conversation
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 54 minutes and 1 second. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR consolidates fragmented AI documentation into authoritative canonical sources under the ChangesAI Documentation Consolidation
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #461CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fddff01178
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| Canonical AI references are maintained under [`ai/`](./ai/), including | ||
| [`ai/Claude.md`](./ai/Claude.md), [`ai/Gemini.md`](./ai/Gemini.md), and | ||
| [`ai/RUNNERS.md`](./ai/RUNNERS.md). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bump frontmatter for edited docs
For body edits like this added paragraph, scripts/validation/validate-frontmatter-freshness.js requires the affected Markdown frontmatter to change; running npm run validate:frontmatter:changed -- --base 457671513f9064159c70bbde3edb716d7e5c6602^ --head 457671513f9064159c70bbde3edb716d7e5c6602 reports failures for AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, and README.md because their versions were not bumped, and CLAUDE.md also keeps last_updated: "2026-05-20". Please update the edited documents' frontmatter with these content changes so the freshness gate passes.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| license: "GPL-3.0" | ||
| tags: ["ai", "runners", "javascript", "bash", "telemetry"] | ||
| domain: "governance" | ||
| stability: "active" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This new documentation file sets stability: "active", but .schemas/frontmatter.schema.json only allows stable, experimental, or incubating for stability; validating this frontmatter with the repository schema marks ai/RUNNERS.md invalid. Use one of the allowed values or extend the schema before adding this canonical doc.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #461CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
Adds canonical ai/agents.md, ai/Claude.md, ai/Gemini.md, and ai/RUNNERS.md; rewires README/AGENTS/CLAUDE/custom-instructions to point at ai/* authority docs. Closes #64.
Summary by CodeRabbit