Wave 3C: README Update Workflow & Wave 4 Specification#536
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 36 minutes and 19 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR orchestrates a major automation infrastructure update by implementing Wave 3C (README/Mermaid maintenance workflow with Release Agent integration), specifying Wave 4 (continuous monitoring), and updating supporting documentation and metadata across the repository. ChangesAutomation Infrastructure & Roadmap Advancement
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes The PR mixes documentation updates (low density) with a substantive new workflow implementation (medium-high density) and several specification documents. The Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
github-actions
Bot
added
area:ci
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #536CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
- Change status from 'planned' to 'draft' (valid enum value) - Add tags, file_type, and maintainer fields per schema requirements - Fixes frontmatter validation errors on PR #536
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces the specification for Wave 4: Continuous README & Mermaid Monitoring, detailing automated scheduled audits, drift detection, freshness notifications, and quarterly health reports. It also updates the workflow coordination documentation and the Release Agent orchestration flow to integrate the newly implemented readme-update.yml workflow, while correcting several broken relative paths to instruction files. Feedback on the changes highlights a few issues: the example invocation of readme-update.yml incorrectly uses actions/workflow_dispatch@v4 instead of calling the reusable workflow directly, and the workflow-coordination.md file should be renamed to WORKFLOW_COORDINATION.md to comply with uppercase naming standards for the docs/ directory. Additionally, in the new Wave 4 specification file, relative paths to other documentation and instruction files are incorrect due to the file's directory depth, and several local anchor links are broken as their corresponding headers do not exist in the document.
| - name: Apply README updates | ||
| uses: actions/workflow_dispatch@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| workflow: readme-update.yml | ||
| ref: main | ||
| inputs: | ||
| scope: all | ||
| dry_run: 'false' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The example uses actions/workflow_dispatch@v4 which is not an official or valid GitHub Action. Since readme-update.yml supports workflow_call, it should be invoked directly as a reusable workflow using the standard uses syntax. Additionally, please rename this file to WORKFLOW_COORDINATION.md to comply with the rule that documentation and governance files in the docs/ directory must use UPPERCASE naming with underscores.
| - name: Apply README updates | |
| uses: actions/workflow_dispatch@v4 | |
| with: | |
| workflow: readme-update.yml | |
| ref: main | |
| inputs: | |
| scope: all | |
| dry_run: 'false' | |
| - name: Apply README updates | |
| uses: ./.github/workflows/readme-update.yml | |
| with: | |
| scope: all | |
| dry_run: 'false' |
References
- Documentation and governance files in the
docs/directory must use UPPERCASE naming with underscores (e.g.,GOVERNANCE_REVISION_LOG.md), as the lowercase-with-hyphens naming convention applies to other asset types and not todocs/files.
| - [Wave 3B: README & Mermaid Repair & Update](#wave-3b) — parent wave | ||
| - [Wave 3C: Workflow & Agent Coordination Setup](#wave-3c) — parent wave | ||
| - [workflow-coordination.md](./workflow-coordination.md) — orchestration patterns |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The relative paths in these references are incorrect because this file is located three levels deep (.github/projects/active/). They need to be updated to point to the correct locations relative to this file's directory. Additionally, the reference to the workflow coordination document must use the uppercase naming convention with underscores (e.g., WORKFLOW_COORDINATION.md) as required for files in the docs/ directory.
| - [Wave 3B: README & Mermaid Repair & Update](#wave-3b) — parent wave | |
| - [Wave 3C: Workflow & Agent Coordination Setup](#wave-3c) — parent wave | |
| - [workflow-coordination.md](./workflow-coordination.md) — orchestration patterns | |
| - [WORKFLOW_COORDINATION.md](../../docs/WORKFLOW_COORDINATION.md) — orchestration patterns | |
| - [documentation-formats.instructions.md](../../../instructions/documentation-formats.instructions.md) — README standards | |
| - [mermaid.instructions.md](../../../instructions/mermaid.instructions.md) — Mermaid guidelines |
References
- Documentation and governance files in the
docs/directory must use UPPERCASE naming with underscores (e.g.,GOVERNANCE_REVISION_LOG.md), as the lowercase-with-hyphens naming convention applies to other asset types and not todocs/files.
| ## References | ||
|
|
||
| - [Wave 3A: README & Mermaid Discovery & Audit](#wave-3a) — parent wave |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These anchor links are broken because there are no corresponding headers (#wave-3a, #wave-3b, #wave-3c) in this document. They should be changed to plain text or updated to point to the correct files if they exist.
| ## References | |
| - [Wave 3A: README & Mermaid Discovery & Audit](#wave-3a) — parent wave | |
| - Wave 3A: README & Mermaid Discovery & Audit — parent wave | |
| - Wave 3B: README & Mermaid Repair & Update — parent wave | |
| - Wave 3C: Workflow & Agent Coordination Setup — parent wave |
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #536CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
- Update agents/release.agent.md to v2.3 (Wave 3C readme-update integration) - Update workflow-coordination.md to v1.1.0 (readme-update documentation) - Set last_updated to 2026-05-28 for both files - Fixes frontmatter freshness validation on PR #536
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #536CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
1 similar comment
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #536CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
- Move from .github/instructions/plugin-structure.instructions.md to instructions/plugin-structure.instructions.md - Update references in CLAUDE.md and .github/README.md - Per CLAUDE.md guidelines: reusable assets belong in top-level folders, not under .github/ Resolves #535 (Migration issue)
- Create readme-update.yml workflow with Mermaid accessibility and staleness fixes - Support workflow_dispatch (manual) and workflow_call (Release Agent integration) - Implement dry-run mode for safe preview before applying changes - Integrate readme-update into Release Agent post-release orchestration - Update workflow-coordination.md with readme-update workflow documentation - Create Wave 4 specification for continuous README and Mermaid monitoring - Define scheduled audit, drift detection, freshness notifications, and quarterly reports Completes Wave 3C Workflow & Agent Coordination Setup requirements.
- Change status from 'planned' to 'draft' (valid enum value) - Add tags, file_type, and maintainer fields per schema requirements - Fixes frontmatter validation errors on PR #536
- Remove references to #wave-3a, #wave-3b, #wave-3c anchors - These sections don't exist in the document - Keep only valid references to other files - Fixes markdown linting error MD051
- Update agents/release.agent.md to v2.3 (Wave 3C readme-update integration) - Update workflow-coordination.md to v1.1.0 (readme-update documentation) - Set last_updated to 2026-05-28 for both files - Fixes frontmatter freshness validation on PR #536
Update last_updated and version fields for files that received CI formatting changes to satisfy freshness validation requirements. - .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/README.md: v1.1 → v1.2 - DEVELOPMENT.md: 1.0 → 1.1 - docs/RELEASE_PROCESS.md: v2.1.0 → v2.2.0 https://claude.ai/code/session_016wfe4RRq6fm14DSZ6ZFGub
ashleyshaw
force-pushed
the
claude/hopeful-brahmagupta-9MeVh
branch
from
fef9b0c to
c9122d2
Compare
… 4 specification - Document new readme-update.yml workflow with Mermaid accessibility and staleness fixes - Record Wave 4 specification for continuous monitoring - Note Release Agent integration and workflow coordination updates - Document plugin-structure migration to top-level instructions/ Addresses meta:needs-changelog label on PR #536. https://claude.ai/code/session_016wfe4RRq6fm14DSZ6ZFGub
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #536CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 249bcef685
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| return \`\`\`mermaid | ||
| accTitle: \${title} | ||
| \${diagram.trim()} | ||
| \`\`\`; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new workflow is not valid YAML because the template literal content starts at column 1 inside the run: | block, which terminates the block scalar and is parsed as top-level YAML. I checked this with npm run lint:workflows -- --format stylish, which reports parser errors in this file, so GitHub Actions will reject the workflow before it can run. Indent the generated Mermaid lines or move the script to a separate file/heredoc that preserves YAML indentation.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| if (entry.isDirectory() && !entry.name.startsWith('.')) { | ||
| files.push(...findReadmeFiles(path.join(dir, entry.name))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because the README walker skips every directory whose name starts with ., it never enters this repository's .github/ tree, including .github/README.md, which currently contains multiple Mermaid diagrams and stale frontmatter. In this repo that means the advertised README/Mermaid maintenance misses the primary community-health README files; the staleness walker repeats the same predicate and has the same blind spot.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| - name: Generate update report | ||
| if: success() | ||
| run: | | ||
| cat > .github/reports/mermaid-audit/update-report.md <<'EOF' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This report is written into the tracked working tree before git status --porcelain decides whether there are changes, and the later commit step uses git add -A. On a non-dry run with no README or frontmatter fixes, the report alone still makes has_changes=true, so the workflow will push a misleading update commit every time it runs. Write the report outside the checkout, ignore it, or exclude it from the commit/change check.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (4)
.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md (1)
1-10:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winAdd missing required frontmatter fields to satisfy coding guidelines.
The frontmatter is missing several required fields:
owners,status,stability, anddomain. These fields ensure consistent metadata governance across all Markdown files.📋 Proposed fix
--- title: "Workflow Coordination Patterns" description: "Canonical reference for GitHub Actions workflow patterns: always-run vs. agent-triggered, coordination between agents and workflows, and orchestration strategies." created_date: "2026-05-28" last_updated: "2026-05-28" version: "v1.1.0" file_type: "documentation" maintainer: "LightSpeed Team" +owners: ["lightspeedwp/maintainers"] +status: "active" +stability: "stable" +domain: "automation" tags: ["workflows", "automation", "agents", "coordination", "ci-cd"] ---As per coding guidelines, all
.mdfiles must include these frontmatter fields.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md around lines 1 - 10, The frontmatter block is missing required metadata fields; add the keys owners, status, stability, and domain to the existing frontmatter (the YAML block at the top of the file) and populate them with valid values per our guidelines (e.g., owners: list of team or user handles, status: draft|active|deprecated, stability: experimental|stable, domain: logical area). Ensure values follow the project's formatting conventions and update last_updated if needed..github/README.md (2)
23-52:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick winMajor: Remove the prohibited
references:frontmatter field.Per the coding guidelines and CLAUDE.md governance rules, the
references:frontmatter field is forbidden in documentation files. You should use inline links or a footer section instead.This file already has a comprehensive "Related Files" section at the bottom (lines 564-589), so the frontmatter references are redundant anyway! 🎯
♻️ Proposed fix: remove the references field
tags: - github-templates - community-health - automation - copilot - workflows - labeling - ai -references: - - path: ./custom-instructions.md - description: Custom instructions for AI agents - - path: ./agents/agent.md - description: Main agents index - - path: ./prompts/prompts.md - description: Prompts index - - path: ../AGENTS.md - description: Organization-wide agents documentation - - path: ../docs/AUTOMATION_GOVERNANCE.md - description: Automation governance policies - - path: ./labels.yml - description: Label definitions - - path: ./labeler.yml - description: Labeler configuration - - path: ./issue-types.yml - description: Issue type definitions - - path: ./instructions/coding-standards.instructions.md - description: Coding standards instructions - - path: ./instructions/linting.instructions.md - description: Linting standards index - - path: ./instructions/tests.instructions.md - description: Testing standards index - - path: ./workflows/README.md - description: Workflows directory index - - path: ../CONTRIBUTING.md - description: Contribution guidelines - - path: ../docs/README.md - description: Documentation hub ---As per coding guidelines: "Do not add a
references:frontmatter field — use inline links or footer sections instead".🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.github/README.md around lines 23 - 52, Remove the prohibited frontmatter key "references:" and its entire YAML list from the top of the document (the frontmatter block shown in the diff) and instead ensure those links are represented as inline links or appended to the existing "Related Files" section later in the document; locate the "references:" frontmatter block and delete it, and if needed move any important entries into the "Related Files" section so nothing useful is lost.
5-5:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winUpdate frontmatter metadata to reflect the changes.
The pipeline validation spotted that you've changed the document body but haven't bumped the
version(currently3.1) or updatedlast_updated(currently2025-12-04). Since you're migrating instruction link paths and removing deprecated entries, this qualifies as a content change worthy of a version bump! 📝🔢 Proposed fix: bump version and date
-version: "3.1" +version: "3.2" created_date: "2025-01-15" -last_updated: "2025-12-04" +last_updated: "2026-05-28" authors: ["LightSpeed Team"]As per coding guidelines: "For significant changes to Markdown standards, bump
versionand updatelast_updatedin frontmatter".Also applies to: 7-7
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.github/README.md at line 5, Update the frontmatter in the Markdown file by incrementing the version field (change "version": "3.1" to the next appropriate version, e.g., "3.2") and set the last_updated field to the new revision date (replace the existing "last_updated": "2025-12-04" with the current date) so the frontmatter reflects the content changes; modify the frontmatter keys named version and last_updated accordingly.CLAUDE.md (1)
1-8:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winBump CLAUDE.md version to match the content change
CLAUDE.mdalready exists ondevelop(version isv1.1there), so the pipeline warning is likely legitimate: if this PR changes the instruction body, bumpversion(e.g. tov1.2, and updatelast_updated) to keep the freshness check happy.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@CLAUDE.md` around lines 1 - 8, The CLAUDE.md frontmatter still shows version "v1.1" while the file content changed; update the frontmatter `version` to a new value (e.g., "v1.2") and set `last_updated` to today's date to reflect the change so the freshness check passes — edit the `version` and `last_updated` fields in the document header.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml (1)
36-38: ⚡ Quick winConsider removing unused
pull-requests: writepermission.The workflow grants
pull-requests: writebut doesn't create or modify pull requests. Removing this adheres to least-privilege security principles.🔒 Proposed fix
permissions: contents: write - pull-requests: writeAs per coding guidelines, workflows should use least-privilege permissions.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.github/workflows/readme-update.yml around lines 36 - 38, Remove the unnecessary elevated permission by deleting the "pull-requests: write" entry from the permissions block so the workflow only retains required rights (e.g., "contents: write"); update the permissions map under the permissions: key to follow least-privilege principles and ensure no other steps rely on "pull-requests: write" before committing the change..github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md (1)
25-25: ⚡ Quick winWrap this long line at natural sentence boundaries.
This line clocks in at around 329 characters, well beyond the 120-character soft limit. Let's give it some breathing room by splitting it into multiple lines at natural sentence boundaries.
📏 Proposed fix to wrap the line
-Wave 4 establishes continuous, automated monitoring of README files and Mermaid diagrams across the repository. Unlike Waves 3A–3C (which were one-time audit and repair cycles), Wave 4 ensures ongoing compliance with accessibility, freshness, and syntax standards through scheduled checks and proactive notifications. +Wave 4 establishes continuous, automated monitoring of README files and Mermaid diagrams across the repository. +Unlike Waves 3A–3C (which were one-time audit and repair cycles), Wave 4 ensures ongoing compliance with +accessibility, freshness, and syntax standards through scheduled checks and proactive notifications.As per coding guidelines, maximum line length is 120 characters (soft limit; prefer wrapping at natural sentence boundaries).
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md at line 25, The long sentence beginning "Wave 4 establishes continuous, automated monitoring of README files and Mermaid diagrams across the repository..." exceeds the 120-character soft limit; split it into multiple shorter sentences or lines at natural sentence boundaries (for example: end the first line after "repository.", start a new sentence for "Unlike Waves 3A–3C..." and a final sentence for "Wave 4 ensures ongoing compliance..." ), ensuring each resulting line is under ~120 characters and preserves the original meaning and punctuation.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md:
- Around line 180-189: The example workflow invocation "Apply README updates"
incorrectly uses actions/workflow_dispatch@v4; replace that with a direct
workflow call by setting uses: ./.github/workflows/readme-update.yml and keep
the with inputs (scope and dry_run) while removing the invalid workflow and ref
keys, or alternatively document using the GitHub API or gh workflow run if you
intend to trigger a workflow remotely; update the example to use uses:
./.github/workflows/readme-update.yml and preserve inputs scope and dry_run
accordingly.
In @.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md:
- Around line 260-262: The three relative links in
wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md are incorrect; update
./../docs/workflow-coordination.md to ../../../docs/workflow-coordination.md
(pointing to the real docs/workflow-coordination.md location) and change
../instructions/documentation-formats.instructions.md and
../instructions/mermaid.instructions.md to
../../../instructions/documentation-formats.instructions.md and
../../../instructions/mermaid.instructions.md respectively so all three links
correctly resolve from the .github/projects/active/ directory.
In @.github/README.md:
- Around line 481-494: There are 14 consecutive blank lines in the README (the
reviewed block) that violate MD012; remove the extra blank lines so that only a
single blank line remains between content blocks—replace the 14 blank lines with
exactly one blank line to satisfy the linter.
In @.github/workflows/readme-update.yml:
- Around line 65-137: The YAML fails to parse because the node --eval inline JS
uses unescaped template literals/backticks with ${diagram.trim()} inside the
workflow run: | block (see the run string that defines findReadmeFiles and the
mermaid replacement callback), which breaks YAML parsing; fix by replacing those
ES6 template-literal return values in the mermaid replacement (the branches that
currently return backtick-wrapped strings containing ${...}) with plain
concatenated single-quoted JS strings (e.g., '```mermaid\n' + title + '\n' +
diagram.trim() + '\n```') so no unescaped ${...} or backticks appear in the YAML
scalar, and keep the same changes to modified, fs.writeFileSync, and console.log
behavior.
---
Outside diff comments:
In @.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md:
- Around line 1-10: The frontmatter block is missing required metadata fields;
add the keys owners, status, stability, and domain to the existing frontmatter
(the YAML block at the top of the file) and populate them with valid values per
our guidelines (e.g., owners: list of team or user handles, status:
draft|active|deprecated, stability: experimental|stable, domain: logical area).
Ensure values follow the project's formatting conventions and update
last_updated if needed.
In @.github/README.md:
- Around line 23-52: Remove the prohibited frontmatter key "references:" and its
entire YAML list from the top of the document (the frontmatter block shown in
the diff) and instead ensure those links are represented as inline links or
appended to the existing "Related Files" section later in the document; locate
the "references:" frontmatter block and delete it, and if needed move any
important entries into the "Related Files" section so nothing useful is lost.
- Line 5: Update the frontmatter in the Markdown file by incrementing the
version field (change "version": "3.1" to the next appropriate version, e.g.,
"3.2") and set the last_updated field to the new revision date (replace the
existing "last_updated": "2025-12-04" with the current date) so the frontmatter
reflects the content changes; modify the frontmatter keys named version and
last_updated accordingly.
In `@CLAUDE.md`:
- Around line 1-8: The CLAUDE.md frontmatter still shows version "v1.1" while
the file content changed; update the frontmatter `version` to a new value (e.g.,
"v1.2") and set `last_updated` to today's date to reflect the change so the
freshness check passes — edit the `version` and `last_updated` fields in the
document header.
---
Nitpick comments:
In @.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md:
- Line 25: The long sentence beginning "Wave 4 establishes continuous, automated
monitoring of README files and Mermaid diagrams across the repository..."
exceeds the 120-character soft limit; split it into multiple shorter sentences
or lines at natural sentence boundaries (for example: end the first line after
"repository.", start a new sentence for "Unlike Waves 3A–3C..." and a final
sentence for "Wave 4 ensures ongoing compliance..." ), ensuring each resulting
line is under ~120 characters and preserves the original meaning and
punctuation.
In @.github/workflows/readme-update.yml:
- Around line 36-38: Remove the unnecessary elevated permission by deleting the
"pull-requests: write" entry from the permissions block so the workflow only
retains required rights (e.g., "contents: write"); update the permissions map
under the permissions: key to follow least-privilege principles and ensure no
other steps rely on "pull-requests: write" before committing the change.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: adba5c66-2266-49a9-b097-374f159e50fe
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/README.md.github/README.md.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md.github/workflows/readme-update.ymlCHANGELOG.mdCLAUDE.mdDEVELOPMENT.mdagents/release.agent.mddocs/RELEASE_PROCESS.mdinstructions/plugin-structure.instructions.md
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: coderabbit-gate
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (8)
**/*.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/instructions/markdown.instructions.md)
**/*.md: Use one H1 (#) per file; keep heading levels sequential (never skip from H2 to H4)
Use fenced code blocks with explicit language tags (bash,yaml,markdown, etc.)
Keep links relative for in-repo files; verify they resolve before merging
Use1.for ordered lists and-for unordered lists in Markdown
Keep all wording in UK English (optimise, organisation, colour, behaviour, analyse)
Do not add areferences:frontmatter field — use inline links or a footer section instead
Add blank lines before and after headings, code blocks, and block-level elements in Markdown
Maximum line length: 120 characters (soft limit; prefer wrapping at natural sentence boundaries)
All.mdfiles must include YAML frontmatter with required fields:file_type,title,description,version,last_updated,owners,tags,status, andstability, anddomain
Every image (![]()) must have descriptive alt text explaining the image's purpose, not its appearance. Empty alt is valid only for purely decorative images
Link text must describe the destination — never use "click here", "read more", or bare URLs as visible text
Every table in Markdown must have a header row (| Header |). Avoid merged cells
Use headings in Markdown to communicate document structure, not for visual styling
Do not rely on colour alone to convey information in diagrams or callout blocks in Markdown
Mermaid diagrams in Markdown must includeaccTitleandaccDescrattributes for accessibility
Runnpm run lint:mdbefore merging any Markdown changes to validate heading hierarchy and link text
Runnpm run validate:frontmatterto validate frontmatter schema against.schemas/frontmatter.schema.json
For significant changes to Markdown standards, bumpversionand updatelast_updatedin frontmatter
Files:
DEVELOPMENT.mddocs/RELEASE_PROCESS.mdCLAUDE.mdCHANGELOG.mdagents/release.agent.md
**/*.{md,txt,js,ts,tsx,jsx,py,php}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Use UK English throughout (optimise, organisation, colour, behaviour)
Files:
DEVELOPMENT.mddocs/RELEASE_PROCESS.mdCLAUDE.mdCHANGELOG.mdagents/release.agent.md
**/*.{md,instructions.md}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Do not add a
referencesfrontmatter field in documentation—use inline links or footer sections instead
Files:
DEVELOPMENT.mddocs/RELEASE_PROCESS.mdCLAUDE.mdCHANGELOG.mdagents/release.agent.md
**/docs/**/*.md
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
**/docs/**/*.md: Review documentation files:
- Ensure markdown is linted and formatted per project style guides.
- Flag illogical folder structures, file naming, or misplaced content.
- Confirm documentation is up to date, accurate, and cross-referenced.
- Ensure accessibility (heading hierarchy, alt text for images, UK English).
Files:
docs/RELEASE_PROCESS.md
.github/**
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Place GitHub-native governance assets (templates, labels, workflows) in
.github/
Files:
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/README.md.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md.github/workflows/readme-update.yml.github/README.md
**/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/*.md
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
**/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/*.md: Review pull request template files:
- Ensure valid markdown syntax and clear contributor instructions.
- Validate YAML frontmatter and template metadata.
- Confirm templates are up to date with current process.
Files:
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/README.md
CHANGELOG.md
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
CHANGELOG.md: Review CHANGELOG.md:
- Confirm entries follow Keep a Changelog 1.1.0 format.
- Each entry under [Unreleased] must include a PR link and issue link.
- Verify entries use the correct section headings (Added, Changed, Fixed, Deprecated, Removed, Security, Documentation, Performance).
- Check UK English spelling throughout.
Files:
CHANGELOG.md
**/.github/workflows/*.yml
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
**/.github/workflows/*.yml: Review GitHub Actions workflows for this governance repo:
- Security: check for least-privilege permissions (use
permissions:at job level, default to read-only).- Secret handling: ensure secrets are passed via env vars, not interpolated directly into run: steps to prevent injection.
- Action pinning: prefer SHA-pinned actions over mutable tags (e.g.
actions/checkout@v4is acceptable; SHA pins are better).- No
pull_request_targetwith untrusted code execution unless explicitly justified.- Avoid storing sensitive outputs as unmasked step outputs.
- Check for reusable workflow patterns and matrix strategies where appropriate.
- Validate
on:triggers: ensure branch/path filters are present to avoid unnecessary runs.- Confirm workflows are documented, DRY, and maintainable.
- Ensure agent-triggered workflows use
workflow_dispatchwith defined inputs.
Files:
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github
Timestamp: 2026-05-28T20:00:54.395Z
Learning: Do not commit `node_modules/`, `build/`, or other generated artefacts
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github
Timestamp: 2026-05-28T20:00:54.395Z
Learning: Do not place WordPress plugin or theme project-specific code in `.github/`
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github
Timestamp: 2026-05-28T20:00:54.395Z
Learning: Do not place reports or task trackers in `docs/` or the repo root
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeedwp/.github
Timestamp: 2026-05-28T20:00:54.395Z
Learning: Do not move existing agents, instructions, or schemas without a migration issue that records source path, target path, and validation plan
🪛 actionlint (1.7.12)
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
[error] 109-109: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':'
(syntax-check)
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI / 0_check.txt
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
[error] 119-119: spectral lint failed. YAML parser error at 119:9: "Can not read a block mapping entry; a multiline key may not be an implicit key".
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI / check
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
[error] 119-119: spectral lint failed (spectral/JSON schema: parser). parser error: "Can not read a block mapping entry; a multiline key may not be an implicit key"
🪛 GitHub Actions: lint / 0_lint.txt
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
[error] 119-119: Spectral lint failed (parser): "Can not read a block mapping entry; a multiline key may not be an implicit key"
🪛 GitHub Actions: lint / lint
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
[error] 119-119: spectral lint (npm run lint:yaml) YAML parser error: Can not read a block mapping entry; a multiline key may not be an implicit key
🪛 GitHub Actions: Meta Agent / 2_lint-and-links.txt
.github/README.md
[error] 481-494: markdownlint-cli2 failed with 14 errors (markdownlint rule MD012/no-multiple-blanks: Multiple consecutive blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 2..15]).
🪛 GitHub Actions: Meta Agent / 3_front-matter-validate.txt
CLAUDE.md
[error] 1-1: Frontmatter freshness validation error: body changed but version was not updated (v1.1).
.github/README.md
[error] 1-1: Frontmatter freshness validation error: body changed but last_updated was not updated (2025-12-04).
[error] 1-1: Frontmatter freshness validation error: body changed but version was not updated (3.1).
🪛 GitHub Actions: Meta Agent / front-matter-validate
CLAUDE.md
[error] 1-1: Frontmatter freshness validation failed: body changed but version was not updated (v1.1).
.github/README.md
[error] 1-1: Frontmatter freshness validation failed: body changed but last_updated was not updated (2025-12-04).
[error] 1-1: Frontmatter freshness validation failed: body changed but version was not updated (3.1).
🪛 GitHub Actions: Meta Agent / lint-and-links
.github/README.md
[error] 481-493: markdownlint-cli2/markdownlint: MD012/no-multiple-blanks Multiple consecutive blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 2-14]
🪛 GitHub Check: check
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
[failure] 136-136:
parser
[failure] 136-136:
parser
[failure] 127-127:
parser
[failure] 127-127:
parser
[failure] 127-127:
parser
[failure] 119-119:
parser
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
[failure] 136-136:
parser
[failure] 136-136:
parser
[failure] 127-127:
parser
[failure] 127-127:
parser
[failure] 127-127:
parser
[failure] 119-119:
parser
🪛 LanguageTool
CLAUDE.md
[uncategorized] ~10-~10: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ed Team" --- # CLAUDE.md — LightSpeed .github > Full organisation-wide AI rules, cod...
(GITHUB)
[style] ~20-~20: Would you like to use the Oxford spelling “organization”? The spelling ‘organisation’ is also correct.
Context: ...Repository Is This is the LightSpeed organisation .github control plane. It owns: - ...
(OXFORD_SPELLING_Z_NOT_S)
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... This is the LightSpeed organisation .github control plane. It owns: - GitHub co...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...o-local Copilot and agent instructions (.github/instructions/, `.github/custom-instruc...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... instructions (.github/instructions/, .github/custom-instructions.md). - Reports, pr...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~35-~35: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ions/| Portable instruction files (no.githubassumptions) | |plugins/` | Installa...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~40-~40: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... Do not place reusable assets under .github/—use the matching top-level folder ins...
(GITHUB)
[style] ~66-~66: Would you like to use the Oxford spelling “optimize”? The spelling ‘optimise’ is also correct.
Context: ... - Language: UK English throughout (optimise, organisation, colour, behaviour). - **...
(OXFORD_SPELLING_Z_NOT_S)
[style] ~66-~66: Would you like to use the Oxford spelling “organization”? The spelling ‘organisation’ is also correct.
Context: ...age:** UK English throughout (optimise, organisation, colour, behaviour). - **Coding Standar...
(OXFORD_SPELLING_Z_NOT_S)
[uncategorized] ~72-~72: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...truction files:** Follow the pattern in `.github/instructions/instructions.instructions....
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~78-~78: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...rnance (templates, labels, workflows) | .github/ | | Repo-local Copilot/agent instruct...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~79-~79: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...Repo-local Copilot/agent instructions | .github/instructions/ or `.github/custom-instr...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~79-~79: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...structions | .github/instructions/ or .github/custom-instructions.md | | Reports, au...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~80-~80: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ions.md| | Reports, audits, metrics |.github/reports/{category}/` | | Active project...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~81-~81: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...egory}/| | Active project artefacts |.github/projects/active/{slug}/` | | Temporary ...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~82-~82: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: .../{slug}/| | Temporary scratch files |.github/tmp/` (clean up before PR) | | Portable...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~88-~88: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...lugin or theme project-specific code to .github/. - Do not place reports or task track...
(GITHUB)
[style] ~90-~90: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...trackers in docs/ or the repo root. - Do not create instruction files with a `re...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~91-~91: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ith a references frontmatter field. - Do not move existing agents, instructions,...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~92-~92: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...th, target path, and validation plan. - Do not enqueue editor-only WordPress asset...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~93-~93: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ts on the front end (and vice versa). - Do not commit node_modules/, build/, o...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[uncategorized] ~98-~98: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ..../AGENTS.md) — full global AI rules - [.github/custom-instructions.md](./.github/custo...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~98-~98: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... rules - .github/custom-instructions.md — Copilot-speci...
(GITHUB)
[duplication] ~98-~98: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...nstructions.md) — Copilot-specific repo instructions - [instructions/coding-standards.instructions.md](./ins...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[uncategorized] ~100-~100: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ions.md) — unified coding standards - [.github/instructions/file-organisation.instruct...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~100-~100: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ctions/file-organisation.instructions.md](./.github/instructions/file-organisation.instruct...
(GITHUB)
CHANGELOG.md
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...nd Mermaid Maintenance Workflow** — New .github/workflows/readme-update.yml workflow a...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...6)) - Wave 4 Specification — Added `.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monit...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~35-~35: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... Coordination Documentation** — Updated .github/docs/workflow-coordination.md (v1.0.0 ...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~40-~40: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: .../plugin-structure.instructions.mdfrom.github/instructions/to top-levelinstructio...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~42-~42: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...le assets - Updated references across .github/README.md and CLAUDE.md - Clarifie...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~43-~43: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...itory structure: GitHub-native files in .github/, portable assets in top-level folders...
(GITHUB)
.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md
[uncategorized] ~163-~163: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ummary Input Parameters: - scope: "all" | "mermaid" | "staleness" (defaul...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
agents/release.agent.md
[uncategorized] ~83-~83: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...u are the Release Manager Agent for lightspeedwp/.github. Automate release validation, changelo...
(GITHUB)
[grammar] ~91-~91: In this context, ‘type’ should agree in number with the noun after ‘of’.
Context: ... release.yml, and changelog.yml. # Type of Tasks - Preparation Phase: Analyze repos...
(TYPE_OF_PLURAL)
[uncategorized] ~101-~101: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... Confirm context & scope - Repo: lightspeedwp/.github; default scope patch unless specifie...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~114-~114: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ... Workflow validation - Enumerate .github/workflows/*.yml; highlight invalid ref...
(GITHUB)
[duplication] ~123-~123: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...ntax and version alignment. 11. Agent readiness - Readiness table per agent (spec, script, workflow...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[uncategorized] ~137-~137: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...angelog link). 7. Post-merge: verify no drift develop↔main; log outcomes; prep next c...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~141-~141: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ngelog validation**: enforce schema via .github/workflows/changelog.yml and `changelog...
(GITHUB)
[typographical] ~153-~153: Except for inverted sentences, ‘Must All’ requires a question mark at the end of the sentence.
Context: ...Invoked Sequentially (Must All Pass): 1. linting.yml via `workflow_cal...
(MD_PRP_QUESTION_MARK)
[formatting] ~178-~178: Consider inserting a comma here: “as configured) Expected,”?
Context: ... Input: period: "last-7-days" (or as configured) - Expected Output: Metrics JSON in `.github/repo...
(AS_EXPECTED_COMMA)
[style] ~328-~328: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: .... - Do not bypass failed validations. - Do not edit files without explicit user co...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~329-~329: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...s without explicit user confirmation. - Do not assume user wants automated changes...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md
[uncategorized] ~38-~38: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ables ### 1. Scheduled Audit Workflow (.github/workflows/readme-audit-scheduled.yml) ...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~58-~58: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...nd) ### 2. Continuous Drift Detection (.github/workflows/readme-drift-detect.yml) **...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~78-~78: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ilable ### 3. Freshness Notifications (.github/workflows/readme-freshness-notify.yml)...
(GITHUB)
[uncategorized] ~96-~96: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...pdated ### 4. Quarterly Health Report (.github/workflows/readme-health-quarterly.yml)...
(GITHUB)
[grammar] ~245-~245: You’ve repeated a verb. Did you mean to only write one of them?
Context: ...tion from code 3. Wave 7: Cross-Repo Monitoring - Monitor READMEs across all LightSpeed repositor...
(REPEATED_VERBS)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.38.0)
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
[error] 110-110: syntax error: could not find expected ':'
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml (3)
139-196: Same YAML syntax error in staleness update script.The staleness script has the same template literal issue at line 180. This will also fail to parse.
Apply the same fix pattern as the Mermaid script: replace template literals with string concatenation:
const newFrontmatter = frontmatter.replace( /last_updated:\s*[\"']?[^\"'\n]+/, - \`last_updated: \\\"\${today}\\\"\` + 'last_updated: \"' + today + '\"' ); - const newContent = content.replace(frontmatterMatch[0], \`---\n\${newFrontmatter}\n---\`); + const newContent = content.replace(frontmatterMatch[0], '---\\n' + newFrontmatter + '\\n---');
237-248: LGTM!
255-260: LGTM!.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md (1)
83-91: LGTM!.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/README.md (1)
5-7: LGTM!agents/release.agent.md (4)
14-15: LGTM!
147-226: LGTM!
227-266: LGTM!
268-276: LGTM!docs/RELEASE_PROCESS.md (1)
2-3: LGTM!DEVELOPMENT.md (1)
5-6: LGTM!CHANGELOG.md (1)
10-44: LGTM!.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md (2)
13-257: LGTM!
1-11:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winAdd missing required frontmatter fields:
owners,stability, anddomain.Brilliant Wave 4 spec structure, but the frontmatter is missing three required fields per the coding guidelines. Every
.mdfile needsowners,stability, anddomainin addition to the fields already present.Also note: you have
maintainerbut the guidelines requireownersinstead (or in addition to).✨ Proposed fix to add missing frontmatter fields
--- title: "Wave 4: Continuous README & Mermaid Monitoring" description: "Automated continuous monitoring, scheduled audits, and proactive maintenance for README files and Mermaid diagrams" created_date: "2026-05-28" last_updated: "2026-05-28" version: "v1.0.0-draft" status: "draft" +stability: "experimental" tags: ["wave-4", "monitoring", "automation", "readme", "mermaid"] file_type: "documentation" +domain: "automation" +owners: ["LightSpeed Team"] maintainer: "LightSpeed Team" ---As per coding guidelines, all
.mdfiles must includefile_type,title,description,version,last_updated,owners,tags,status,stability, anddomain.> Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| ```yaml | ||
| - name: Apply README updates | ||
| uses: actions/workflow_dispatch@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| workflow: readme-update.yml | ||
| ref: main | ||
| inputs: | ||
| scope: all | ||
| dry_run: 'false' | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the workflow invocation syntax in the example.
The example uses actions/workflow_dispatch@v4, but that action doesn't exist. To call a workflow from another workflow, use uses: with the workflow path; to trigger via script/agent, use the GitHub API or gh workflow run.
🔧 Proposed fix for workflow_call pattern
**Example Release Agent Invocation**:
```yaml
-- name: Apply README updates
- uses: actions/workflow_dispatch@v4
- with:
- workflow: readme-update.yml
- ref: main
- inputs:
- scope: all
- dry_run: 'false'
+- name: Apply README updates (post-release)
+ uses: ./.github/workflows/readme-update.yml
+ with:
+ scope: all
+ dry_run: 'false'🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md around lines 180 - 189, The example
workflow invocation "Apply README updates" incorrectly uses
actions/workflow_dispatch@v4; replace that with a direct workflow call by
setting uses: ./.github/workflows/readme-update.yml and keep the with inputs
(scope and dry_run) while removing the invalid workflow and ref keys, or
alternatively document using the GitHub API or gh workflow run if you intend to
trigger a workflow remotely; update the example to use uses:
./.github/workflows/readme-update.yml and preserve inputs scope and dry_run
accordingly.
| - [workflow-coordination.md](./../docs/workflow-coordination.md) — orchestration patterns | ||
| - [documentation-formats.instructions.md](../instructions/documentation-formats.instructions.md) — README standards | ||
| - [mermaid.instructions.md](../instructions/mermaid.instructions.md) — Mermaid guidelines |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the actual locations of the referenced files
echo "=== Checking workflow-coordination.md ==="
fd -t f "workflow-coordination.md"
echo -e "\n=== Checking documentation-formats.instructions.md ==="
fd -t f "documentation-formats.instructions.md"
echo -e "\n=== Checking mermaid.instructions.md ==="
fd -t f "mermaid.instructions.md"
echo -e "\n=== Correct paths from .github/projects/active/ ==="
echo "Current file: .github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md"
echo "To .github/docs/ → ../../docs/"
echo "To repo-root instructions/ → ../../../instructions/"
echo "To .github/instructions/ → ../../instructions/"Repository: lightspeedwp/.github
Length of output: 545
Fix broken relative links in .github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md
- Lines 261-262:
instructions/documentation-formats.instructions.mdandinstructions/mermaid.instructions.mdlive under repo-rootinstructions/, so from.github/projects/active/they should be../../../instructions/documentation-formats.instructions.mdand../../../instructions/mermaid.instructions.md(current../instructions/...is one level short). - Line 260:
./../docs/workflow-coordination.mddoesn’t resolve to an existing file in this repo, so update it to the actual location ofworkflow-coordination.mdand keep the relative path notation consistent across all three links.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md around lines 260 -
262, The three relative links in wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md are incorrect;
update ./../docs/workflow-coordination.md to
../../../docs/workflow-coordination.md (pointing to the real
docs/workflow-coordination.md location) and change
../instructions/documentation-formats.instructions.md and
../instructions/mermaid.instructions.md to
../../../instructions/documentation-formats.instructions.md and
../../../instructions/mermaid.instructions.md respectively so all three links
correctly resolve from the .github/projects/active/ directory.
Extract Mermaid diagram and staleness date fixing logic from embedded node --eval blocks in readme-update.yml into separate scripts/ files. This eliminates YAML/JavaScript syntax conflicts and makes the code more maintainable. - Add scripts/fix-mermaid-diagrams.js for Mermaid fixes - Add scripts/fix-staleness-dates.js for date updates - Simplify workflow to call scripts directly - Resolves YAML parser errors from template literals and object syntax
github-actions
Bot
added
area:scripts
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #536CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
- Remove multiple consecutive blank lines in .github/README.md - Delete temporary wave-2a-agent-status-document.md file from .github/tmp/ - Resolves markdown linting errors (MD012)
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #536CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
- Update last_updated date to 2026-05-28 - Increment version to 3.2
🔍 Reviewer Summary for PR #536CI Status: ✅ Recommendations
|
2 participants
Summary
Complete Wave 3C implementation with README update workflow and Wave 4 specification.
Changes
New Workflows
.github/workflows/readme-update.yml: Automated workflow for README & Mermaid diagram fixesworkflow_dispatch(manual) andworkflow_call(Release Agent)Integrations
agents/release.agent.md): Added post-release readme-update invocation.github/docs/workflow-coordination.md): Documented readme-update with inputs/outputs/contractsPlanning
.github/projects/active/wave-4-continuous-monitoring.md): Comprehensive continuous monitoring planAcceptance Criteria
readme-update.ymlcreated with Mermaid and staleness fixesTesting
The readme-update workflow can be tested via:
Related Issues
Generated by Claude Code