Skip to content

feat(issues): restore relation commands - #235

Merged
iamfj merged 1 commit into
linearis-oss:nextfrom
ralfschimmel:codex/port-issue-relation-compat
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

feat(issues): restore relation commands#235
iamfj merged 1 commit into
linearis-oss:nextfrom
ralfschimmel:codex/port-issue-relation-compat

Conversation

@ralfschimmel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • restore issues relations list/add/remove compatibility on the new command architecture
  • add similar relation support via issues relations add --similar and direct --similar-to flags
  • expand relation GraphQL output with source/target issue details and expose listIssueRelations service helper

Verification

  • refreshed GraphQL codegen from Linear live schema at https://api.linear.app/graphql; current IssueRelationType includes blocks, duplicate, related, and similar
  • npm test
  • npm run check:ci (passes with existing Biome schema-version info)
  • npm run build

@ralfschimmel
ralfschimmel requested a review from iamfj as a code owner June 22, 2026 20:38
@ralfschimmel
ralfschimmel marked this pull request as draft June 23, 2026 06:59
@ralfschimmel
ralfschimmel marked this pull request as ready for review June 23, 2026 07:13
@iamfj
iamfj changed the base branch from main to next July 2, 2026 10:21
@iamfj
iamfj force-pushed the codex/port-issue-relation-compat branch from 970b8b4 to e0f880c Compare July 2, 2026 10:21
@iamfj
iamfj merged commit 1985391 into linearis-oss:next Jul 2, 2026
6 checks passed
@iamfj

iamfj commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for bringing back the issue relation commands — great to have these back. Now available on the prerelease channel (npm i -g linearis@next, currently 2026.6.0-next.5) for testing. Planning to promote to stable soon (#231). Happy for any feedback!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants