Skip to content

Conversation

@jdamore-linode
Copy link
Contributor

@jdamore-linode jdamore-linode commented Jul 24, 2025

Description 📝

Experimenting to see if increasing the waitFor timeout resolves the flake in the Security.test.tsx spec. If CI passes, I'll kick it off a few more times to confirm it's passing reliably. If not, I'll try increasing the timeout and/or applying the timeout to the entire test.

Changes 🔄

  • Increase waitFor timeout from 1s to 5s

Target release date 🗓️

N/A.

How to test 🧪

It seems like this test is passing locally for most users. Intel Mac users may be able to observe the failure by running the following against develop:

pnpm test Linodes/LinodeCreate

It seems like this test fails most often in CI, so I've run the tests against the PR 5 times and it's passed each time.

As an Author, to speed up the review process, I considered 🤔

👀 Doing a self review
❔ Our contribution guidelines
🤏 Splitting feature into small PRs
➕ Adding a changeset
🧪 Providing/improving test coverage
🔐 Removing all sensitive information from the code and PR description
🚩 Using a feature flag to protect the release
👣 Providing comprehensive reproduction steps
📑 Providing or updating our documentation
🕛 Scheduling a pair reviewing session
📱 Providing mobile support
♿ Providing accessibility support


  • I have read and considered all applicable items listed above.

As an Author, before moving this PR from Draft to Open, I confirmed ✅

  • All tests and CI checks are passing
  • TypeScript compilation succeeded without errors
  • Code passes all linting rules

@jdamore-linode jdamore-linode marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2025 21:02
@jdamore-linode jdamore-linode requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2025 21:02
@jdamore-linode jdamore-linode requested review from bnussman-akamai and mjac0bs and removed request for a team July 24, 2025 21:02
@jdamore-linode
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ran CI 5 times in a row and didn't observe any failures so it looks like increasing the timeout did the trick here 👍 just pushed a changeset so it and the Cypress tests will run one more time.

Copy link
Contributor

@mjac0bs mjac0bs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image Yay, it passed CI again. Thanks, Joe, for the quick fix. 🚀

@mjac0bs mjac0bs added the Add'tl Approval Needed Waiting on another approval! label Jul 24, 2025
Copy link
Member

@bnussman-akamai bnussman-akamai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review to Approved in Cloud Manager Jul 24, 2025
@bnussman-akamai bnussman-akamai added Approved Multiple approvals and ready to merge! and removed Add'tl Approval Needed Waiting on another approval! labels Jul 24, 2025
@linode-gh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Cloud Manager UI test results

🎉 690 passing tests on test run #2 ↗︎

❌ Failing✅ Passing↪️ Skipped🕐 Duration
0 Failing690 Passing4 Skipped117m 33s

@mjac0bs mjac0bs merged commit 00874ec into linode:develop Jul 24, 2025
35 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Approved to Merged in Cloud Manager Jul 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Approved Multiple approvals and ready to merge!

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants