Skip to content

Conversation

@igorkudrin
Copy link
Collaborator

If HardwareBreakpointTestBase.supports_hw_breakpoints() returns False, SimpleHWBreakpointTest.does_not_support_hw_breakpoints() returns None, so the test runs and fails. However, it should be skipped instead.

The test was added in #146602, while supports_hw_breakpoints() was changed in #146609, which was landed earlier despite having a bigger number.

If 'HardwareBreakpointTestBase.supports_hw_breakpoints()' returns False,
'SimpleHWBreakpointTest.does_not_support_hw_breakpoints()' returns None,
so the test runs and fails. However, it should be skipped instead.

The test was added in llvm#146602, while 'supports_hw_breakpoints()' was
changed in llvm#146609, which was landed earlier despite having a bigger
number.
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Nov 20, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb

Author: Igor Kudrin (igorkudrin)

Changes

If HardwareBreakpointTestBase.supports_hw_breakpoints() returns False, SimpleHWBreakpointTest.does_not_support_hw_breakpoints() returns None, so the test runs and fails. However, it should be skipped instead.

The test was added in #146602, while supports_hw_breakpoints() was changed in #146609, which was landed earlier despite having a bigger number.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168813.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) lldb/test/API/functionalities/breakpoint/hardware_breakpoints/simple_hw_breakpoints/TestSimpleHWBreakpoints.py (+11-20)
diff --git a/lldb/test/API/functionalities/breakpoint/hardware_breakpoints/simple_hw_breakpoints/TestSimpleHWBreakpoints.py b/lldb/test/API/functionalities/breakpoint/hardware_breakpoints/simple_hw_breakpoints/TestSimpleHWBreakpoints.py
index ccbb23507c1be..acf75df6711cd 100644
--- a/lldb/test/API/functionalities/breakpoint/hardware_breakpoints/simple_hw_breakpoints/TestSimpleHWBreakpoints.py
+++ b/lldb/test/API/functionalities/breakpoint/hardware_breakpoints/simple_hw_breakpoints/TestSimpleHWBreakpoints.py
@@ -7,13 +7,7 @@
 
 
 class SimpleHWBreakpointTest(HardwareBreakpointTestBase):
-    def does_not_support_hw_breakpoints(self):
-        # FIXME: Use HardwareBreakpointTestBase.supports_hw_breakpoints
-        if super().supports_hw_breakpoints() is None:
-            return "Hardware breakpoints are unsupported"
-        return None
-
-    @skipTestIfFn(does_not_support_hw_breakpoints)
+    @skipTestIfFn(HardwareBreakpointTestBase.hw_breakpoints_unsupported)
     def test(self):
         """Test SBBreakpoint::SetIsHardware"""
         self.build()
@@ -35,16 +29,13 @@ def test(self):
         # breakpoint will be marked as a hardware breakpoint.
         self.assertTrue(break_on_me_bp.IsHardware())
 
-        if super().supports_hw_breakpoints():
-            self.assertSuccess(error)
-
-            # Continue to our Hardware breakpoint and verify that's the reason
-            # we're stopped.
-            process.Continue()
-            self.expect(
-                "thread list",
-                STOPPED_DUE_TO_BREAKPOINT,
-                substrs=["stopped", "stop reason = breakpoint"],
-            )
-        else:
-            self.assertFailure(error)
+        self.assertSuccess(error)
+
+        # Continue to our Hardware breakpoint and verify that's the reason
+        # we're stopped.
+        process.Continue()
+        self.expect(
+            "thread list",
+            STOPPED_DUE_TO_BREAKPOINT,
+            substrs=["stopped", "stop reason = breakpoint"],
+        )

@github-actions
Copy link

🐧 Linux x64 Test Results

  • 33162 tests passed
  • 495 tests skipped

Copy link
Collaborator

@DavidSpickett DavidSpickett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@igorkudrin igorkudrin merged commit ccdb719 into llvm:main Nov 20, 2025
12 checks passed
@igorkudrin igorkudrin deleted the lldb-fix-simple_hw_breakpoints branch November 20, 2025 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants