Hi 👋 ,
Sometimes you need to do operations on images that you need to do a .toBuffer() so the next step of the image manipulation would use the output & metadata of the previous step.
The problem is that every time you do a sharp(image) the image seems to lose quality incrementally. Like
image = sharp(buffer).trim().toBuffer()
// ... some logic ...
image = sharp(image).resize().toBuffer()
// ... some logic ...
image = sharp(image).extract().toBuffer()
The code above is just an example but you can imagine that each operation might be on different files and image is like a shared context.
Is there any way you would recommend/suggest to do this without losing quality every time we sharp() the image buffer?
I read this discussion earlier: #241 and it seems that it might solve this specific problem but it seems that it's only a "concept" for now.
Let me know if I need to provide more info!
Thanks! 🙏
Hi 👋 ,
Sometimes you need to do operations on images that you need to do a
.toBuffer()so the next step of the image manipulation would use the output & metadata of the previous step.The problem is that every time you do a
sharp(image)the image seems to lose quality incrementally. LikeThe code above is just an example but you can imagine that each operation might be on different files and
imageis like a shared context.Is there any way you would recommend/suggest to do this without losing quality every time we
sharp()the image buffer?I read this discussion earlier: #241 and it seems that it might solve this specific problem but it seems that it's only a "concept" for now.
Let me know if I need to provide more info!
Thanks! 🙏