Skip to content

Axi4 passive vip#391

Open
csabakiss-semify wants to merge 3 commits intolowRISC:mainfrom
csabakiss-semify:axi4_passive_vip
Open

Axi4 passive vip#391
csabakiss-semify wants to merge 3 commits intolowRISC:mainfrom
csabakiss-semify:axi4_passive_vip

Conversation

@csabakiss-semify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

  1. Developed AXI4 VIP supporting passive mode only
  2. VIP integrated to the top level environment
  3. Added scoreboard to the AXI XBAR

Tested with top level test cases.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@martin-velay martin-velay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have added some comments, but I am still not done, I'll do another batch later. There are still some coding style issues

@@ -0,0 +1,306 @@
// This AXI4 VIP shall be always UVM_PASSIVE on top level
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The copyright header is missing

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added

Comment on lines +24 to +30
typedef enum bit[2:0] {
mst0 = 0,
slv0 = 1,
slv1 = 2,
slv2 = 3,
slv3 = 4
} axi_if_t;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be possible to change the field names into something more explicit like that maybe:

Suggested change
typedef enum bit[2:0] {
mst0 = 0,
slv0 = 1,
slv1 = 2,
slv2 = 3,
slv3 = 4
} axi_if_t;
typedef enum bit[2:0] {
mst0_cva6 = 0,
slv0_sram = 1,
slv1_mailbox = 2,
slv2_tl_xbar = 3,
slv3_dram = 4
} axi_if_t;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

top_pkg field names are used.

// AXI VIP configuration
axi_cfg = new[NUM_OF_AXI_IFS];
env.cfg.m_axi_cfg = new[NUM_OF_AXI_IFS];
foreach(axi_cfg[i]) begin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: you need a space here and same below for the case. Can you please check else where in your code that you follow this rule.
https://github.com/lowRISC/style-guides/blob/master/VerilogCodingStyle.md#space-around-keywords

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed


foreach (actual_q[s]) foreach (actual_q[s][i]) if (actual_q[s][i].size() > 0)
`uvm_error("SCB_DRAIN", $sformatf("Slave trans on %s (ID %h) never reached Master", s, i))
endfunction : check_phase No newline at end of file
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You need to configure your editor to make sure you insert an empty line at the end of each file (it's also part of the coding rules somewhere)

string slave_name;
bit [63:0] start_addr;
bit [63:0] end_addr;
} local_addr_range_t;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you move this typedef into the env_pkg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved.

int unsigned master_id_width = 4;

// Analysis Implementation Ports
`uvm_analysis_imp_decl(_mst0)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the names if we can make it clearer which block is connected, as commented in the env_pkg, that would be better for debug purposes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated using the top_pkg names


// Queues to handle out-of-order monitor arrivals
// [SlaveName][MaskedID]
axi4_vip_item expect_q[string][bit[63:0]][$]; // Master arrived first
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this 64 bits width linked with top_pkg::AxiDataWidth? It's better to point to a pkg value, this should be applied wherever required in this PR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is ID width to handle when the interconnect extends the ID width to be able to back-route the transactions to the managers. However, good spot, the scoreboard cuts the unnecessary bits before anything is pushed to this queue. Replaced by parameter.

Comment on lines +69 to +72
mem_map.push_back('{"slv0", 64'h1000_0000, 64'h1001_FFFF});
mem_map.push_back('{"slv1", 64'h2001_0000, 64'h2001_FFFF});
mem_map.push_back('{"slv2", 64'h4000_0000, 64'h4FFF_FFFF});
mem_map.push_back('{"slv3", 64'h8000_0000, 64'hBF7F_FFFF});
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here, the same applies, could you point at the pkg values please axi_addr_start_t

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed


function string top_chip_dv_axi_scoreboard::decode_addr(bit [63:0] addr);
foreach (mem_map[i]) begin
if (addr >= mem_map[i].start_addr && addr <= mem_map[i].end_addr)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You need to add the begin...end for each if whenever it doesn't fit on a single line as a rule. But as we talk about DV here, I'd prefer to add the begin...end and always jump a line this will facilitate breakpoint debug

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added.


function void top_chip_dv_axi_scoreboard::check_phase(uvm_phase phase);
super.check_phase(phase);
foreach (expect_q[s]) foreach (expect_q[s][i]) if (expect_q[s][i].size() > 0)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be break down into multi lines and I think one foreach is useless:

Suggested change
foreach (expect_q[s]) foreach (expect_q[s][i]) if (expect_q[s][i].size() > 0)
foreach (expect_q[s][i]) begin
if (expect_q[s][i].size() > 0) begin
`uvm_error("SCB_DRAIN", $sformatf("Master req for %s (ID %h) never reached Slave", s, i))
end

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

// maximum supported bus widths
`define AXI4_MAX_ID_WIDTH 16
`define AXI4_MAX_ADDR_WIDTH 64
`define AXI4_MAX_DATA_WIDTH 512
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason why DATA_WIDTH 1024 is not supported?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated to 1024.

if (current_burst == null) current_burst = axi4_vip_item::type_id::create("w_burst");

current_burst.dir = AXI_WRITE;
current_burst.wdata.push_back(vif.monitor_cb.wdata & ((64'h1 << m_cfg.m_data_width) - 1));
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@thommythomaso thommythomaso Apr 1, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this be 512'h1 (or 1024'h1) for all rdata and wdata types?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated with the given define.


// Local Address Map Struct
typedef struct {
string slave_name;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: the new nomenclature of AXI uses manager and subordinate.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we talked about this. Is it better if the naming matches the AXI standard or the current RTL. I know, the new standard uses manager and subordinate, but the RTL uses master and slave.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@martin-velay martin-velay Apr 2, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd say that we should follow the latest nomenclature with manager/subordinate. So it might be that the RTL needs to be changed? But from our concern in this VIP, as its purpose goes beyond this particular DUT eventually, I'd suggest to use the new wording. Do you think there will be some confusing piece of code where the 2 kinds will live together?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated names.

begin
bit [63:0] addr = (tr.dir == AXI_WRITE) ? tr.awaddr : tr.araddr;
bit [63:0] id = (tr.dir == AXI_WRITE) ? tr.awid : tr.arid;
// Note: resp logic simplified here for example; normally bit-sliced per beat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please formulate this comment more precise?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a legacy comment from a previous version. Thanks for spotting it. Removed.

Signed-off-by: Csaba Kiss <csaba.kiss@semify-eda.com>
Signed-off-by: Csaba Kiss <csaba.kiss@semify-eda.com>
…top UVM environment

Signed-off-by: Csaba Kiss <csaba.kiss@semify-eda.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants