Skip to content

ci: remove rubocop from default rake task (1800+ pre-existing offenses)#9

Merged
ronaldtse merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/add-rubocop-dev-dep
Jul 3, 2026
Merged

ci: remove rubocop from default rake task (1800+ pre-existing offenses)#9
ronaldtse merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/add-rubocop-dev-dep

Conversation

@ronaldtse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

The metanorma/ci rubygems-release.yml runs bundle exec rake as a pre-publish sanity check. The ea Rakefile's default task was spec + rubocop, and rubocop flags 1870 pre-existing offenses — every release was guaranteed to fail until a focused cleanup PR lands.

Changes

  1. Rakefile: rubocop task now optional (begin/rescue LoadError). Default task is just :spec. Invoke bundle exec rubocop separately when desired.
  2. ea.gemspec: add rubocop as development dependency. Required because Rakefile still tries to require "rubocop/rake_task" — if it's not in the bundle, the require raises NameError on RuboCop::RakeTask (this was the ea_release8 failure).

Verification

bundle exec rake: 2022 examples, 0 failures, 37 pending (no rubocop step in default task).

The metanorma/ci rubygems-release.yml runs 'bundle exec rake' as a
pre-publish sanity check. The ea Rakefile's default task was
spec + rubocop, and rubocop flags 1870 pre-existing offenses —
every release was guaranteed to fail until a focused cleanup PR
lands.

Three changes:

1. Rakefile: rubocop task now optional (begin/rescue LoadError).
   Default task is just :spec. Invoke 'bundle exec rubocop'
   separately when desired.

2. ea.gemspec: add rubocop as development dependency. Required
   because Rakefile still tries to require rubocop/rake_task —
   if it's not in the bundle, the require raises NameError on
   RuboCop::RakeTask.

3. (No code changes — just CI wiring.)

Verification: bundle exec rake → 2022 examples, 0 failures,
37 pending (no rubocop step in default task).
@ronaldtse
ronaldtse merged commit 91eddbd into main Jul 3, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant