Skip to content

Show only the active simulator route by default - #3

Merged
lynnswap merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/clarify-status-route
Aug 29, 2026
Merged

Show only the active simulator route by default#3
lynnswap merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
codex/clarify-status-route

Conversation

@lynnswap

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Purpose

The default status output currently makes the answer users need most—whether the next Xcode Run uses Device Hub or CoreSimulator—hard to find in a large diagnostic block.

Make that route immediately visible while keeping the existing diagnostic information available on demand.

Changes

  • Print exactly one route line for a normal status result: Device Hub or CoreSimulator using the Xcode 26 Simulator.
  • Add status --verbose for Xcode installations, managed preferences, restoration state, and running Xcode processes.
  • Read only the managed preference and restoration snapshot for compact status, so route reporting does not depend on Xcode discovery or installation validation.
  • Keep interrupted or conflicting preference states actionable with one additional guidance line and the existing configuration exit code.
  • Treat the existing --legacy-xcode status override as a verbose request and document the compact/verbose contract.

Review focus

  • Whether the managed preference snapshot is the correct owner of the compact route answer.
  • Whether the compact safety warnings remain useful without reintroducing diagnostic noise.
  • Whether compact and verbose acquisition preserve the existing receipt-locking and conflict behavior.

Testing

  • DEVELOPER_DIR=/Applications/Xcode_27.app/Contents/Developer swift test — 71 tests passed.
  • actionlint
  • shellcheck scripts/*.sh
  • Built the arm64 release binary and verified the archive, checksums, generated installer, installation, and reported version with the release scripts.
  • Manually verified compact and verbose output against the current Xcode 27/CoreSimulator configuration.
  • Branch-wide Codex review against main completed with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-29T08:04:08.116334Z acafba4 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 914af059ae

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread README.md

@lynnswap lynnswap left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: cf1c985f1c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@lynnswap lynnswap left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll.

Reviewed commit: acafba4954

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@lynnswap
lynnswap merged commit c3fb08f into main Aug 29, 2026
1 check passed
@lynnswap
lynnswap deleted the codex/clarify-status-route branch August 29, 2026 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant