spec: §2.9 and §2.5 state their backend status honestly (#537) - #538
Merged
Conversation
The unbounded array section claimed the reference and the tool carry it and named a tables/lists corpus that does not exist. It now says owed, not emitted, like every other section that landed ahead of its implementation, and names the corpus as what the implementation owes. The byte-buffer section's status line now says the *wstring blob is specified and not yet emitted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Sep 4, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #537. SPEC-TABLES.md §2.9 said the C++ reference and the tool carry unbounded arrays and named a
tables/listscorpus; neither exists in the tree. It now reads owed, not emitted, on the terms §3.3 and §6.6 take, with the corpus named as what the implementation owes. §2.5's status line now says the*wstringblob is specified ahead of its implementation and not yet emitted. Docs only.🤖 Generated with Claude Code