feat: add explicit branch access for memory operations#203
Merged
aptend merged 1 commit intoMay 25, 2026
Merged
Conversation
ca5f8f0 to
ea65f72
Compare
ea65f72 to
b6b3eab
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Motivation
This PR supports concurrent subagent exploration. Multiple subagents using the same Memoria user can now operate on different branches by passing branch explicitly, instead of racing on the shared mem_user_state.active_branch checkout pointer.
Validation
Note: MatrixOne-backed branch_ops integration test was added, but local execution previously timed out because the database was unavailable.