runtime % support for FreeRTOS V11 #57
Conversation
|
@hwmland @haneefdm @PhilippHaefele I would love your input on this. |
|
Looks OK for me. |
|
Any chance of this getting merged and released soon? I would love to use runtime stats in my FreeRTOS v11 based project! |
|
I tried to merge this but it has conflicts with recently merged PR#45. Sorry for the late merge. @Jonarw, Could you resolve them please? |
|
I'll look into this today, thanks for the heads up |
In V11, FreeRTOS changed ulTotalRunTime from an integer to an array of integers. On SMP, the array has one entry per CPU, but it's still a one-element array even without SMP support compiled in. Try finding the length of the array with sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]). If that succeeds, sum all CPU runtimes to get the total runtime. If it fails, assume V10 or earlier and fall back to the previous technique.
Convert `updateTotalRuntime()` to an async function. Use `RTOSVarHelper.getVarChildren()` to check for the presence of children and to get their values.
malsyned
force-pushed
the
freertos-11-runtime
branch
from
209c92d to
f801fc7
Compare
|
OK, I rebased onto the head of I tested this updated PR with versions of FreeRTOS that used both an array and a scalar for Hopefully you don't mind that I rewrote |
4 participants
In V11, FreeRTOS changed
ulTotalRunTimefrom an integer to an array of integers. On SMP, the array has one entry per CPU, but it's still a one-element array even without SMP support compiled in.Try finding the length of the array with
sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]). If that succeeds, sum all CPU runtimes to get the total runtime. If it fails, assume V10 or earlier and fall back to the previous technique.