Merged
Conversation
antepusic
reviewed
Feb 19, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks fine 👍. If this comment about clarifying the README is still applicable, I’ll approve once you update that.
Contributor
Author
|
I've created an issue and PR on the official docs to add the documentation about this, it seems the cypherl format was never documented at all and noted there that only dump database is supported. Link |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Print out error message when cypherl output format is used on non-string objects to make it more clear that it can only be used with DUMP DATABASE.
Issues:
closes #69