Potential technical overhead by adding RSpec to the gem?

[andreip1]

passive_queue/Gemfile

Line 6 in 8a74422

gem "rspec", "~> 3.0"

I came across this project and I was ready to pitch it to my CTO, but I'm not sure it's in the right state.

Could I suggest removing rspec as it implies the need to test, and consequentially, of doing something which I feel it's against passive_queue's ethos.

What do you think?

[seuros]

This literally break the second amendment of this gem: Zero Dependencies.

We should also move it to a MAGA (Make Async Great Again) organization.

I vote for @ioquatix as the Async's President.

[mensfeld]

Absolute bug.