-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Versioning and Compatibility
Meridian Verity Group edited this page Jul 19, 2026
·
1 revision
PermitReceipt uses several identifiers because they describe different layers. Do not collapse them into one “version.”
| Layer | Current identifier | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub release/tag | v2.2.6-public-eval |
Immutable reviewer-facing release lineage and asset tuple. |
| Python package | 2.2.6 |
Package implementation version. |
| Evaluation suite | ORPRG-Eval v3.2 |
Version of the public evaluation semantics and vector suite. |
| Canonicalization profile | CP-JSON-2 |
Deterministic JSON canonicalization/action-binding profile used by the evaluation slice. |
| Authorization-reference profile | orprg.authorization-ref.public-eval.v2 |
Public evaluation authorization-reference behavior. |
| Carrier profile | PermitReceipt.authorization-ref.carrier.public-eval.v1 |
Version of the public carrier shape/semantics. |
| Internet-Draft | draft-lee-orprg-permit-receipts-00 |
Standards-discussion document revision; independent of software release numbering. |
- A package patch release does not automatically change a canonicalization, receipt, carrier, or evaluation profile.
- A profile change that alters canonical bytes, covered fields, verification semantics, or required failure behavior should receive a new profile identifier.
- A changed release byte requires a new release tag and checksum, even when the semantic change is “documentation only.”
- An Internet-Draft revision does not automatically supersede a frozen public evaluation release; the relationship must be documented.
- A verifier should reject unsupported or ambiguous profile identifiers rather than guessing compatibility.
- Cross-version tests should cover both intended compatibility and required fail-closed rejection.
Use one canonical reviewer-facing tag per immutable tuple. Do not replace published assets after checksums are public. If an erratum changes any released byte, publish a fresh tag and fresh checksum, manifest, and provenance.
Every interoperability or reproduction report should state all applicable identifiers, not merely “v2.2.6.” At minimum record:
release tag
source commit
package version
evaluation suite
canonicalization profile
authorization-reference profile
carrier profile
Internet-Draft revision
The canonical taxonomy is maintained in the repository's version documentation and release lineage checks: