Invalidate dot-starting emails#170
Merged
micke merged 2 commits intomicke:masterfrom Oct 30, 2020
Merged
Conversation
According to RFC 3696 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3696): > Without quotes, local-parts may consist of any combination of > alphabetic characters, digits, or any of the special characters > ! # $ % & ' * + - / = ? ^ _ ` . { | } ~ > period (".") may also appear, but may not be used to start or end the > local part, nor may two or more consecutive periods appear. Stated > differently, any ASCII graphic (printing) character other than the > at-sign ("@"), backslash, double quote, comma, or square brackets may > appear without quoting. If any of that list of excluded characters > are to appear, they must be quoted.
Owner
|
Thank you for your contribution! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Great little gem! I'm looking forward to trying it out on my next project.
Going through the list of open issues, I noticed that #164 wouldn't be a lot of work so I threw together a quick PR. Please let me know if it's acceptable 🙇