Skip to content

Refresh planner priorities for 4669#4670

Merged
asim merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/planner-4669
Jul 11, 2026
Merged

Refresh planner priorities for 4669#4670
asim merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/planner-4669

Conversation

@asim

@asim asim commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary:

  • Remove the closed zero-to-hero race item from the loop queue.
  • Promote the AtlasCloud plan/delegate plan persistence issue as the next highest-value active gap, keeping cross-provider conformance and provider resilience next.

Testing:

  • git diff --check
  • go build ./... (interrupted after extended no-output compile)
  • timeout 120s go test ./... (failed/timed out with pre-existing environment/live-provider failures)
  • timeout 120s golangci-lint run ./... (failed: installed golangci-lint built with Go 1.24, repo targets Go 1.25.12)

Closes #4669

@asim asim added the codex label Jul 11, 2026
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 11, 2026 07:41
@asim asim merged commit ca3aa27 into master Jul 11, 2026
13 checks passed
@asim asim mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the autonomous loop’s ranked work queue to reflect the latest closed item and promote the next highest-value active gap, aligning the planner with Issue #4669’s direction.

Changes:

  • Removes the previously top-ranked (now-closed) zero-to-hero race item from the queue.
  • Promotes the AtlasCloud plan/delegate plan persistence gap to the top priority, keeping cross-provider conformance next.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@asim asim mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loop: planning review #174

3 participants