Skip to content

Conversation

@jepasan
Copy link
Contributor

@jepasan jepasan commented Oct 3, 2025

As suggested in #783, this pull request changes the old unifrac implementation from rbiom::unifrac to corresponding ecodive functions. Based on my own testing the results are identical to the old version, and there seems to be a noticeable increase in speed as well. I think this means that #756 can be closed, as I doubt there would be anything to gain in continuing to develop our own unifrac implementation alongside ecodive's.

@jepasan jepasan requested a review from TuomasBorman October 3, 2025 15:15
@antagomir
Copy link
Member

Sorry for delays. This had escaped my attention. Looks very good. Can we merge, or does @TuomasBorman have any final remarks?

@RiboRings could we use this for updated benchmarks in OMA paper..?

@RiboRings
Copy link
Member

Sure! I will wait for this to be merged.

@TuomasBorman TuomasBorman linked an issue Dec 9, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@TuomasBorman TuomasBorman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thank you!

@TuomasBorman TuomasBorman merged commit 3645a0c into microbiome:devel Dec 9, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@antagomir
Copy link
Member

Sure! I will wait for this to be merged.

Oke - @RiboRings way to go!

@RiboRings
Copy link
Member

Added here: microbiome/OMA_manuscript#75

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rbiom::unifrac deprecated

4 participants