-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Change unifrac implementation from rbiom to ecodive #786
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Sorry for delays. This had escaped my attention. Looks very good. Can we merge, or does @TuomasBorman have any final remarks? @RiboRings could we use this for updated benchmarks in OMA paper..? |
|
Sure! I will wait for this to be merged. |
TuomasBorman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thank you!
Oke - @RiboRings way to go! |
|
Added here: microbiome/OMA_manuscript#75 |
As suggested in #783, this pull request changes the old unifrac implementation from
rbiom::unifracto correspondingecodivefunctions. Based on my own testing the results are identical to the old version, and there seems to be a noticeable increase in speed as well. I think this means that #756 can be closed, as I doubt there would be anything to gain in continuing to develop our own unifrac implementation alongsideecodive's.