The Toulmin analysis says the SDK’s production story is directionally strong but incomplete because it does not yet define approval workflows, canary criteria, rollback triggers, or monitoring guidance. The architecture already supports versioned policy snapshots and rollback, but the operational controls around them need to be made concrete.
This ticket should move the SDK from “architecturally safe” to “operationally governed.”
Suggested scope
Add policy promotion workflow support with approval records.
Add canary rollout configuration and comparison metrics between old and new policy versions.
Add rollback triggers and a clear recovery path.
Add monitoring guidance for judge drift, reward-quality degradation, and learning pause behavior.
Acceptance criteria
The repo includes example governance workflows or docs for rollout and rollback.
The runtime can support canary comparison with persisted metrics.
The docs clearly separate capture, training, and promotion controls.
The Toulmin analysis says the SDK’s production story is directionally strong but incomplete because it does not yet define approval workflows, canary criteria, rollback triggers, or monitoring guidance. The architecture already supports versioned policy snapshots and rollback, but the operational controls around them need to be made concrete.
This ticket should move the SDK from “architecturally safe” to “operationally governed.”
Suggested scope
Add policy promotion workflow support with approval records.
Add canary rollout configuration and comparison metrics between old and new policy versions.
Add rollback triggers and a clear recovery path.
Add monitoring guidance for judge drift, reward-quality degradation, and learning pause behavior.
Acceptance criteria
The repo includes example governance workflows or docs for rollout and rollback.
The runtime can support canary comparison with persisted metrics.
The docs clearly separate capture, training, and promotion controls.