Add option packToPath to pack packages instead of publishing#1076
Merged
ecraig12345 merged 1 commit intomainfrom Oct 21, 2025
Merged
Add option packToPath to pack packages instead of publishing#1076ecraig12345 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ecraig12345 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
altinokdarici
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New version of #935: Add an option
packToPathto support the new workflow of using an ADO task to publish to npm. If this option is provided, the actual publish step will be skipped, and insteadnpm packwill be called on each package (with the resulting files moved to the specified directory).Usage from command line (could also be in a config file):
beachball publish --packToPath /somewhere/my-pack-dirThe files in the pack directory will look like this, supposing
foodepends onbardepends onbaz:The numeric prefixes reflect the proper topological ordering, to prevent dependency references to new package versions that don't exist yet if there's a failure or slowdown midway through the publishing job in a monorepo. (For > 9 files, the prefixes would be 0-padded for proper sorting, e.g.
01-bar-...or001-bar-....)