Fix TRX result attachment layout to include per-test relative results directory#8188
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Evangelink <11340282+Evangelink@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix incorrect paths to result files after merge
Fix TRX result attachment layout to include per-test relative results directory
May 13, 2026
Member
|
@copilot please add an acceptance test too |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR fixes a TRX attachment layout mismatch where per-test artifacts were being copied to .../In/<machine>/... while TRX consumers resolve them via .../In/<relativeResultsDirectory>/<machine>/..., causing attachment resolution failures (including Azure DevOps publishing).
Changes:
- Updated
TrxReportEngineto copy per-testResultFileartifacts underrunDeploymentRoot/In/<relativeResultsDirectory>/<machine>/...by passingexecutionId(emitted asrelativeResultsDirectory) into the copy-path computation. - Kept TRX
ResultFile pathvalues machine-relative (<machine>/<file>), preserving existing TRX payload shape. - Extended the existing TRX unit test to assert that the copy destination includes the
relativeResultsDirectorysegment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport/TrxReportEngine.cs |
Routes per-test artifact copy destinations under In/<relativeResultsDirectory>/<machine> while keeping href machine-relative. |
test/UnitTests/Microsoft.Testing.Extensions.UnitTests/TrxTests.cs |
Adds regression assertion verifying the per-test artifact copy destination includes relativeResultsDirectory. |
Copilot's findings
- Files reviewed: 2/2 changed files
- Comments generated: 0
Co-authored-by: Evangelink <11340282+Evangelink@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
Author
Added an acceptance test in |
Member
|
/review |
Contributor
|
❌ Expert Code Review (command) failed. Please review the logs for details. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bug Fix
What was the bug?
With
--report-trx --results-directory TestResults, per-test artifacts were copied to.../In/<machine>/...while TRX consumers resolved attachments via.../In/<relativeResultsDirectory>/<machine>/.... This mismatch caused attachment open failures locally and dropped attachments in Azure DevOps publishing.How did you fix it?
TrxReportEngineto route per-test artifact copies under:<resultsDirectory>/<runDeploymentRoot>/In/<executionId>/<machineName>/...executionIdis already emitted asrelativeResultsDirectory, so physical layout now matches downstream lookup behavior.ResultFile pathremains machine-relative (<machineName>/<fileName>), preserving current TRX payload shape.relativeResultsDirectorysegment.Testing
Added/updated unit coverage in
TrxTeststo verify that per-test artifact copy paths include:.../In/<relativeResultsDirectory>/MachineName/fileName.