docs: for pull #594, fixed 2 outdated doc(s)#595
Merged
kevwilliams merged 1 commit intoMay 4, 2026
Conversation
4 tasks
|
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
dffc5a3
into
feat/quota-feature-registration-type
3 of 4 checks passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
✨ Autofixed 2 outdated doc(s)
This pull was automatically generated by Joggr to fix 2 outdated doc(s) due to code changes in pull #594
Fixed docs
The following docs were fixed:
docs/api/quota.md: The documentation was outdated because it omitted the newly-added 'Feature' type for resource registration, which is now a valid registration type with unique semantics. All locations describing valid types, measurement types, or the table entry were updated to include a clear explanation of Feature and its behavior.test/quota/registration-validation/README.md: Documentation is outdated because a significant validation scenario—the creation and validation of a 'Feature' type ResourceRegistration—was added to tests and type enums but was not reflected in the test case matrix or steps in the README. I've inserted this missing scenario in both the test listing and detailed test description sections.How to fix
To fix the docs, you can either:
Powered by Joggr - The documentation assistant for your codebase.