Fix dependency version range

[ondrejsevcik]

Fixed version range is unnecessary in this case and will cause troubles to consumers.

[Exelord]

I can't agree here :/ We cannot guarantee this package will be compatible with every future version of its dependency. We can put trust on this but then things are "released" without testing and are out of the control.

However, I think, we can use ~ as it will use the latest 0.0.X fix release of the package. Im still very skeptical to it, as I think more troubles can make auto-updated dependency than strictly bound version

[ondrejsevcik]

Version ranges is a topic on it's own, but fixed versions are almost never good in library package.
When every library would have a fixed version numbers, I would have a project with dozens identical dependencies in different versions that will most likely not play nice together.