Skip to content

chore(deps): lock file maintenance#612

Merged
joryirving merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): lock file maintenance#612
joryirving merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance

Conversation

@its-miso

@its-miso its-miso Bot commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone America/Edmonton)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 5am on monday"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

@its-miso
its-miso Bot requested a review from joryirving as a code owner June 22, 2026 06:40

@its-saffron its-saffron Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Automated Review

Full PR review.

Analysis engine: MiniMax-M2.7@https://litellm.jory.dev/v1 (anthropic) — escalated (fast_low_confidence)

Review Summary

PR PR 612: `chore(deps): lock file maintenance

Recommendation: Approve — This is a low-risk lock file refresh by Renovate Bot.


Changes Overview

Only package-lock.json was modified (32 additions, 19 deletions). The following transitive dependencies were updated:

Package Old Version New Version Type
@types/node 25.9.3 26.0.0 Type definitions
body-parser 2.2.2 2.3.0 Runtime middleware
semver 7.8.4 7.8.5 Runtime utility
undici-types 7.24.6 8.3.0 Type definitions
content-type (nested) 2.0.0 Nested under body-parser

Required Checks — Explicitly Addressed

✅ Check for breaking API changes in updated dependencies

Analyzed all four updated packages:

  • semver 7.8.4 → 7.8.5: Patch release. No breaking changes.
  • undici-types 7.24.6 → 8.3.0: Tracks Node.js built-in type definitions. No runtime impact — this is a TypeScript/type-only package.
  • @types/node 25.9.3 → 26.0.0: Type definitions only. The major version bump reflects Node.js 26's updated type surface, but there are no runtime breaking changes — these are compile-time types.
  • body-parser 2.2.2 → 2.3.0: Minor version bump within the 2.x series. The diff shows only dependency version bumps (content-type, http-errors, iconv-lite, qs, raw-body, type-is) — no API surface changes to body-parser itself.

Conclusion: No breaking API changes detected. All updates are either type-only definitions or patch/minor bumps with backward-compatible dependency refreshes.

✅ Run full test suite after upgrade

Verified via CI Status: The test suite completed successfully (status: success). CI ran:

  • test — passed
  • lint — passed
  • npm-audit — passed
  • build (linux/arm64 and linux/amd64) — passed
  • dockerfile-lint — passed
  • merge — passed

Standards Compliance

  • ✅ Follows repository conventions for dependency maintenance (no package.json changes — lock file only)
  • ✅ Lock file refresh is routine maintenance
  • ✅ No files outside package-lock.json changed
  • ✅ CI gates passed before merge

Linked Issue Fit

No linked issues. This is a standalone lock file maintenance PR.


Evidence Provider Findings

No evidence providers configured for this PR.


Tool Harness Findings

No tool calls were made; review conducted from corpus directly.


Unknowns / Needs Verification

None. All required checks are satisfied, CI passed, and no breaking API changes identified.

@joryirving
joryirving merged commit 17bd23d into main Jun 22, 2026
8 checks passed
@joryirving
joryirving deleted the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch June 22, 2026 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant