docs(audit): blessed-ready on-ramp audit — 12 integrations scored#371
Merged
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Benchmark
Details
| Benchmark suite | Current: 45058f1 | Previous: 80bf88e | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
benchmarks/test_guard_cold.py::test_g8_cold_first_resolve |
19410.927283242043 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0001504578648712752) |
20256.926372696715 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0001304204047017757) |
1.04 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g14_concurrent_cached_hit[1] |
291.72317026573165 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00018694366917680895) |
296.603921847961 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000032698898954631875) |
1.02 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g14_concurrent_cached_hit[2] |
282.6799002387832 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000053646861758720794) |
283.41849330902903 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00003491356925393316) |
1.00 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g14_concurrent_cached_hit[4] |
263.96436587878793 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00007178295234535097) |
263.3191074519536 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000040343518982356706) |
1.00 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g15_concurrent_first_resolve[1] |
1314.990415145326 iter/sec (stddev: 0.001178023582427194) |
1440.252579976112 iter/sec (stddev: 0.001025837313037008) |
1.10 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g15_concurrent_first_resolve[2] |
1199.874109208515 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000598396023872191) |
1280.795951498207 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0005300995347842032) |
1.07 |
benchmarks/test_guard_concurrency.py::test_g15_concurrent_first_resolve[4] |
903.4007776972837 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0005641408416050403) |
855.1432573398669 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0011806701617275998) |
0.95 |
benchmarks/test_guard_lifecycle.py::test_g6_build_child_container |
446153.7867139154 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000039412783130317954) |
472880.7168246724 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00001014309348814919) |
1.06 |
benchmarks/test_guard_lifecycle.py::test_g6b_build_child_container_auto_scope |
446737.8528528472 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000010134131634989384) |
448191.31268467766 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000010274743985046669) |
1.00 |
benchmarks/test_guard_lifecycle.py::test_g7_request_lifecycle |
67289.22341666269 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000013624292925495824) |
65435.93297949987 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000014444759748291136) |
0.97 |
benchmarks/test_guard_lifecycle.py::test_g13_teardown_at_scale |
39945.48084764985 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00002089479366346823) |
41984.05781986114 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00002101682504742904) |
1.05 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g1_transient_resolve |
936136.87001647 iter/sec (stddev: 6.600774343644136e-7) |
1215429.0941499644 iter/sec (stddev: 3.13080195718243e-7) |
1.30 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g2_cached_resolve |
2390436.363622198 iter/sec (stddev: 9.32222953303413e-8) |
2469301.007045247 iter/sec (stddev: 6.059463394489887e-8) |
1.03 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g3_deep_chain |
478797.11097386957 iter/sec (stddev: 5.211631714499704e-7) |
480003.52024945786 iter/sec (stddev: 7.890961159912292e-7) |
1.00 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g4_wide_resolve |
302913.98999550525 iter/sec (stddev: 7.714095260621502e-7) |
304831.29517988005 iter/sec (stddev: 6.151240942338982e-7) |
1.01 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g5_cross_scope |
1049494.5709888204 iter/sec (stddev: 5.444039333097466e-7) |
1061724.1552037315 iter/sec (stddev: 3.81843176250558e-7) |
1.01 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g9_context_resolve |
547198.9229896809 iter/sec (stddev: 5.631863497660184e-7) |
538605.4537135221 iter/sec (stddev: 5.846973803542685e-7) |
0.98 |
benchmarks/test_guard_resolve.py::test_g12_override_active_resolve |
373846.1357967765 iter/sec (stddev: 4.3927593839386104e-7) |
368201.3534438208 iter/sec (stddev: 4.871001622823267e-7) |
0.98 |
benchmarks/test_guard_validate.py::test_g10_validate_deep_chain |
24878.503341108713 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00006762677172467947) |
25462.032989681524 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00005840245882042677) |
1.02 |
benchmarks/test_guard_validate.py::test_g11_validate_wide |
17077.576010489585 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000008723599801977079) |
17303.306252365397 iter/sec (stddev: 0.000011235075692512139) |
1.01 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
lesnik512
force-pushed
the
audit-blessed-ready-onramp
branch
from
July 23, 2026 19:47
2c97d3f to
f00fdfb
Compare
lesnik512
force-pushed
the
audit-blessed-ready-onramp
branch
from
July 23, 2026 19:49
f00fdfb to
45058f1
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Read-only audit scoring all 12 framework integrations against an explicit blessed-ready on-ramp rubric, delivering the ground truth the adoption research's A2 item named but never produced. Rationale, locked rubric bars, and verdict rule live in the spec — this PR does not restate them:
planning/changes/2026-07-22.01-blessed-ready-onramp-audit.mdplanning/audits/2026-07-22-blessed-ready-onramp-report.mdResult
@injectasymmetry is inherent, not an adapter gap. All 8@inject-requiring integrations score D5=1: no host framework exposes an unused per-parameter injection seam. So the downstream@injectthread is "document the rationale," not "unify."Usage example:template (only fastapi, litestar have one); no integration ships anexamples/dir. §4 ranks the fixes and tags each with its downstream thread.Method is a source + docs read-through; every score cites a
file:linein a named repo so each finding is refutable. Fresh greps in §5 re-confirm the scorecard (4-vs-8@injectsplit, 2 starters, 0examples/dirs).Scope
Read-only: the only files touched are the report and the change-file. No sibling repo,
architecture/, ordocs/edit; pytest excluded; no template built.just check-planningandjust lint-cigreen.🤖 Generated with Claude Code