use builder style API for process spawning in event loop - #523
Merged
Conversation
Guest0x0
force-pushed
the
simplify-process-FFI
branch
3 times, most recently
from
July 28, 2026 08:58
7197d46 to
f767e29
Compare
Guest0x0
force-pushed
the
simplify-process-FFI
branch
from
July 28, 2026 09:11
f767e29 to
0656e80
Compare
Coverage Report for CI Build 941Coverage decreased (-0.07%) to 76.986%Details
Uncovered Changes
Coverage Regressions2 previously-covered lines in 2 files lost coverage.
Coverage Stats
💛 - Coveralls |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use builder style API for creation of process spawning job, so that we can more easily add more options in the future. Also reserve an
is_orphanflag for the process spawning API for potential future use.Since #518 would require changing the API interface, I think we may also adapt the change here to Wasm as well for cleaner FFI shape? cc @peter-jerry-ye