Skip to content

moruno21/agents-concerto

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

31 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

agents-concerto

Multi-agent development orchestrator on Claude Code — the agents perform, the human keeps the baton (reviews and merges).

A task is classified by complexity, implemented in an isolated git worktree following TDD + Tidy First, reviewed under a two-party boundary (whoever writes code never approves or merges), and the pipeline stops at an open PR ready for review. The human reviews and merges by hand. It is agnostic to the number of target repos: that is just a list in local config.

Two ways to use it

A) As a plugin (recommended, reusable across projects)

The reusable logic (agents, /run and /setup skills, scripts) ships as a plugin; each project supplies its own local config.

Install (from a remote git repo once this is pushed):

claude plugin marketplace add moruno21/agents-concerto
claude plugin install agents-concerto@moruno-plugins

Or add it locally, straight from this checkout:

claude plugin marketplace add /Users/antoniomorunogracia/Developer/personal/agents-concerto
claude plugin install agents-concerto@moruno-plugins

Then, inside any project you want to orchestrate:

/agents-concerto:setup
/agents-concerto:run <task description>

/setup scaffolds a local ./.agent-workspace/config.md; /run runs the pipeline for the task.

B) Standalone (open Claude in this repo)

CLAUDE.md is the always-on orchestrator brain. Copy the config template and run a task:

cp .agent-workspace/config.md.example .agent-workspace/config.md
# edit config.md: repos (+ per-repo PR host), task_source, conventions

Then describe the task (or write .agent-workspace/feature-request.md when task_source: none) and let the orchestrator run the workflow.

Layout

.claude-plugin/     plugin.json + marketplace.json (plugin packaging)
agents/             classifier, implementer (model chosen per invocation),
                    reviewer, orchestrator (spec)
.claude/
  settings.json     standalone permissions (no merge)
skills/
  shape/            /shape — turn a rough idea into a runnable task file
  run/              /run — run the pipeline for a task
  setup/            /setup — bootstrap a project's local config
scripts/            worktree-create / worktree-cleanup / run-log / agent-report
CLAUDE.md           the workflow — single source of truth (both modes)
.agent-workspace/   local config + runtime (gitignored); .example is the template

Design invariants

Config-driven repo count; agents by pipeline function not technology; two-party authority (no code-writer merges); worktree isolation; model chosen by complexity; stop at "PR ready" (no auto-merge); a finite review→fix cap (max_fix_cycles, default 3) then ready-for-human.

Cost

A team of agents costs roughly 4–6× a single Claude Code session. Every run writes a summary (.agent-workspace/runs/<id>/summary.md) with that reminder plus counts of PRs, fix cycles, and escalations.

For a per-agent breakdown, run:

scripts/agent-report.sh

It reads the current Claude Code session transcript and prints one table per run: what each agent did (files touched, commands, agents coordinated) and its token usage plus an API-rate cost reference. It separates the orchestrator's own turns from each subagent (classifier / implementer / reviewer), prices each by model with the three cache tiers, and needs no run-log correlation — the transcript is the single source of truth. Pass a transcript path as the first argument to report on a different session.

The $ column is a reference at API rates, not a charge — under a Claude subscription you are not billed per token, so treat it as the token-cost equivalent (useful for comparing runs or deciding whether a workload belongs on the pay-per-token API). The editable price table lives at the top of the script.

About

Multi-agent development orchestrator on Claude Code: dispatch by complexity, implement in isolated worktrees (TDD + Tidy First), review under a two-party boundary, stop at draft PRs for human merge.

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages