Dynamically changed shape's vertex not working?

[georgeou2003]

I have a model loaded with jsonloader, and add the mesh to scene using the callback function

function addCube( p, g) {

       var materials = [
    new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial( { color: 0xffffff, shading: THREE.FlatShading, vertexColors: THREE.VertexColors } ),
        new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial( { color: 0x000000, shading: THREE.FlatShading, wireframe: true, transparent: true } )];

    mesh = new THREE.Mesh( g, materials );

    mesh.position = p;
    scene.addObject( mesh );
};

However, when I try to dynamically changed the mesh 's vertex position, it seems to fail to reach the geometry of the mesh, the shape of the mesh is not affected at all even if I set the .__dirtyVertices to be true;

        for(i=0;i<meshGeometry.vertieces.length;i++)
                {
            mesh.geometry.vertices[i].position.x-=shiftX;
            mesh.geometry.vertices[i].position.y-=shiftY;
            mesh.geometry.vertices[i].position.z-=shiftZ;
        }
        mesh.geometry.__dirtyVertices = true;

And the system give an uncaught typeerror, it seems that the browser failed to access the mesh geometry.

Is it because the mesh creation is done in the callback function? I look at another demo here
http://mrdoob.github.com/three.js/examples/webgl_ribbons.html

the mesh creation is done outside the callback funciton, and the mesh vertex position could be dynamiclly changed.

Can anyone tell me how to find a way to solve this problem?

[chandlerprall]

Are you using the r46 (newest) version of Three.js? scene.addObject( mesh ) is now just scene.add( mesh )

[georgeou2003]

I have upgraded, but it doesn't seem to help~

[chandlerprall]

Can you put your code up somewhere online so we can look at it? If you don't have web hosting you can put it in a public dropbox directory.

[georgeou2003]

Sorry for not posting the codes, I have solved the problem, by simply setting geometry 's dynamic attributes to be true,
geometry.dynamic=true,
the problem is solved!

[chandlerprall]

Erm, yes - that would be the problem! :)