-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
chore(ci): improve .NET CI workflow #176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update the CI/CD workflow for a .NET project by modifying the build and test jobs and overhauling the coverage reporting. The build job now features a caching step for NuGet packages with a reorganized series of steps. In the test job, the method of installing the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Runner as CI Runner
participant Matrix as Coverage Job (Matrix)
participant Repo as Git Repository
participant Artifact as Coverage Artifact
participant Codecov as Codecov Service
participant Codacy as Codacy Service
Runner ->> Matrix: Start coverage job with matrix parameters [codecov, codacy]
Matrix ->> Repo: Checkout repository
Matrix ->> Artifact: Download coverage report artifact
alt Service Condition: Codecov
Matrix ->> Codecov: Upload coverage report to Codecov
else Service Condition: Codacy
Matrix ->> Codacy: Upload coverage report to Codacy
end
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (4)
24-31: Cache NuGet Packages:
The caching step is well configured with a key generated from the OS and the hash of all*.csprojfiles. This should improve build times by reusing NuGet packages.
Suggestion: If your repository contains additional project types (e.g., VB.NET projects), consider expanding the file pattern accordingly.
48-50: Install dotnet-coverage Tool:
Switching todotnet tool install --global dotnet-coveragemakes the installation process explicit.
Suggestion: Consider specifying a fixed version for reproducibility and ensure that if the tool is already installed, the command handles it gracefully (or use an update command if needed).
54-56: Install ReportGenerator Tool:
The installation of the ReportGenerator tool viadotnet tool install --global dotnet-reportgenerator-globaltoolis clear and consistent.
Suggestion: As with the previous tool, specifying a version might help maintain consistency across builds.
84-92: Upload Coverage Report to Codecov:
The conditional step for uploading to Codecov is well set up using the matrix strategy and correctly appliesif: ${{ matrix.service == 'codecov' }}.
Suggestion: Verify that theuse_oidc: falsesetting is intentional; in some workflows, using OIDC (set totrue) might be preferred for enhanced security.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (9)
16-18: Checkout Repository in Build Job:
The checkout step usingactions/checkout@v4is standard and correctly placed at the beginning of the build job.
19-23: Setup .NET 8:
The use ofactions/setup-dotnet@v4withdotnet-version: 8.0.xis appropriate and ensures the build environment uses the required .NET version.
32-34: Restore Dependencies:
Runningdotnet restoreimmediately after caching ensures dependencies are fetched correctly. The ordering is logical and effective.
35-37: Build Projects:
Usingdotnet build --no-restoreleverages the previous restore step efficiently. This is a good practice to speed up the build.
57-59: Generate Markdown Summary:
Renaming the step to "Generate Markdown summary" clarifies its purpose. The command to generate the Markdown summary using ReportGenerator appears correctly structured.
69-75: New Coverage Job with Matrix Strategy:
The introduction of thecoveragejob, which uses a matrix strategy to handle parallel uploads to Codecov and Codacy, is a strong enhancement. This approach helps in decoupling and speeding up the coverage reporting process.
76-78: Checkout in Coverage Job:
Performing a repository checkout in the new coverage job ensures access to all necessary files. This step is standard and appropriately included.
79-83: Download Coverage Report Artifact:
Usingactions/download-artifact@v4to retrievecobertura.xmlmaintains consistency with the upload in the test job. Confirm that the artifact name matches precisely with what is uploaded.
93-99: Upload Coverage Report to Codacy:
The corresponding conditional step for Codacy is similarly configured and appears correct. The use ofproject-tokenfrom secrets ensures secure handling of credentials.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores