feature/dot-runsettings-file

[nanotaboada]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a tailored test configuration file that refines execution settings and code coverage criteria.
  • Enhanced coverage analysis with structured component management and more precise ignore patterns.
• Chores
  • Updated automation workflow commands to incorporate the new test settings for improved reliability.
  • Modified Codacy configuration for clearer exclusion patterns.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes update the testing and coverage reporting configuration for a .NET project. The GitHub Actions workflow now uses a run settings file when executing tests, providing the ability to customize test execution. A new .runsettings file has been introduced to define configuration parameters such as data collection for code coverage and module exclusions. Additionally, the codecov.yml file has been enhanced with a new component management section and refined ignore patterns.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml	Modified the test command to include the --settings .runsettings argument, enabling the use of a specific run settings file during test execution.
.runsettings	New XML configuration file added to specify test execution settings and code coverage data collection, with rules to exclude modules matching .*\.Tests\.dll$.
codecov.yml	Introduced a new component_management section (with default_rules and individual_components for controllers and services) and updated ignore patterns to glob format.
.codacy.yml	Updated exclusion pattern from '**/test/**' to 'test/**/*' for consistency in test file exclusions and added exclusion for '.runsettings'.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant DT as dotnet Test Process
    participant RS as .runsettings
    participant CC as Code Coverage Collector

    GH->>DT: Execute "dotnet test --settings .runsettings ..."
    DT->>RS: Load test configuration
    DT->>CC: Run tests and collect code coverage
    CC-->>DT: Return coverage data
    DT-->>GH: Output test results and coverage report

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• chore(ci): improve .NET CI workflow #176: Involves modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow for test execution and coverage reporting.
• chore(ci): simplify .NET CI workflow #177: Updates the workflow file to include a specific run settings file, aligning with the changes in test execution configuration.
• refactor!: reorganize folder structure #198: Introduces the .runsettings file, related to configuring test execution settings.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 355f0db and b47e6f9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .codacy.yml (2 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• .codacy.yml

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ -34.52%	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (b9713d8)	1607	954	59.37%
Head commit (b47e6f9)	825 (-782)	205 (-749)	24.85% (-34.52%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#199)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (b9713d8) to head (b47e6f9).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #199      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   91.99%   100.00%   +8.00%     
===========================================
  Files           4         2       -2     
  Lines         612       158     -454     
  Branches       70         9      -61     
===========================================
- Hits          563       158     -405     
+ Misses          7         0       -7     
+ Partials       42         0      -42     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud