Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented Mar 25, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the project's status section in the documentation.
    • Replaced one badge with a new metric indicator.
    • Added an additional badge to highlight enhanced code quality monitoring.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the status badges in the project's README file. The Codacy Coverage badge has been removed and replaced with a SonarCloud Bugs badge. Additionally, a new Codebeat badge has been added, while the remaining status indicators remain unchanged. These modifications serve only as visual updates to reflect different metrics, without impacting any functionality.

Changes

File Summary
README.md - Removed Codacy Coverage badge
- Added SonarCloud Bugs badge
- Added Codebeat badge

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (18db95a) 1225 697 56.90%
Head commit (e4cf298) 1225 (+0) 697 (+0) 56.90% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#186) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

5-5: Status Badges Update: Badge Integration Verified
The updated badge line correctly removes the Codacy Coverage badge and adds the SonarCloud Bugs badge along with the new Codebeat badge, matching the PR objectives. The badge URLs and markdown syntax appear correct.

Consider verifying the visual consistency and alignment of these badges across different markdown renderers.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~5-~5: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 6 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3240 characters long)
Context: ...ples.AspNetCore.WebApi/maintainability) [![Codacy Badge](https://app.codacy.com/pr...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18db95a and e4cf298.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~5-~5: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 6 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3240 characters long)
Context: ...ples.AspNetCore.WebApi/maintainability) [![Codacy Badge](https://app.codacy.com/pr...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit 2334689 into master Mar 25, 2025
22 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the feature/readme-status-badges branch March 25, 2025 01:47
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants