feature/dotfiles

[nanotaboada]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Revised the project status display with updated badges and quality metrics.
  • Improved guidance documentation with an added reference link for configuration details.

• Chores

  • Adjusted the dependency update schedule to run daily, ensuring more timely maintenance.
  • Streamlined configuration files by removing obsolete commentary for clarity.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several configuration and documentation files. It adds a reference comment with a URL to the Codacy configuration file, changes the Dependabot update schedule for the nuget and GitHub Actions ecosystems from weekly to daily, reorganizes the status badges in the README by removing some and adding a new "Quality Gate Status" badge, and removes extraneous commented documentation from the Codecov configuration file.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.codacy.yml, codecov.yml	Updated configuration documentation: added a reference comment with a URL in .codacy.yml and removed commented guidance from codecov.yml.
.github/dependabot.yml	Modified update schedule for package ecosystems, switching both "nuget" and "github-actions" from weekly to daily updates.
README.md	Reorganized status badges: removed the "Bugs" and "Maintainability" badges, added a "Quality Gate Status" badge, and reordered the remaining badges.

Possibly related PRs

• chore: update status badges #186: Updated status badges in the README, which is closely related to the badge reorganization introduced in this pull request.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2334689 and 3dda68c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .codacy.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/dependabot.yml (2 hunks)
• README.md (1 hunks)
• codecov.yml (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

README.md

[style] ~9-~9: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 5 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3077 characters long)
Context: ...boada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi) [![CodeFactor](https://www.codefactor.io/r...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

🔇 Additional comments (5)

.codacy.yml (1)

1-2: Enhanced Documentation Reference
The addition of the URL comment at the top provides a useful reference to the Codacy configuration docs. This extra context can help users understand and customize the configuration if needed.

.github/dependabot.yml (2)

7-9: Updated Nuget Update Schedule
The update interval for the "nuget" package ecosystem has been changed to "daily". Please verify that this increased frequency aligns with your project's resource management and CI/CD pipeline capacity.

---

21-23: Updated GitHub Actions Update Frequency
Similarly, the schedule for "github-actions" is now set to "daily". Confirm that the daily updates provide the desired balance between staying current and avoiding potential update overload.

codecov.yml (1)

1-2: Documentation Reference in Codecov Config
The newly added comment linking to the Codecov YAML documentation is a welcome enhancement. Removing extraneous comments makes the file cleaner while retaining helpful reference information.

README.md (1)

5-11: Reorganized and Updated Status Badges
The rearrangement of status badges, with the addition of the "Quality Gate Status" badge, improves the visual representation of the project’s health. Ensure that each badge URL is correct and actively reflects the intended status metrics.

🧰 Tools

🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~9-~9: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 5 exclamation marks for a text that’s 3077 characters long)
Context: ...boada/Dotnet.Samples.AspNetCore.WebApi) [![CodeFactor](https://www.codefactor.io/r...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00%	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (2334689)	1225	697	56.90%
Head commit (3dda68c)	1225 (+0)	697 (+0)	56.90% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#188)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2334689) to head (3dda68c).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #188   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines          119       119           
  Branches         7         7           
=========================================
  Hits           119       119           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.