Add smart-money-pnl-leaderboard research command

[gulshngill]

Summary

• add nansen research smart-money-pnl-leaderboard
• map chain, timeframe, filter, sort, and pagination options to the public API request
• document the command and add focused API, dispatch, validation, and coverage tests

Validation

• npm test -- src/__tests__/research.test.js src/__tests__/coverage.test.js — 88 passed
• npm test — 2,548 passed, 2 skipped
• npm run lint
• git diff --check main...HEAD

[nansen-pr-reviewer]

pr-reviewer Summary for #725653d

📝 1 finding

Review completed. Please address the findings below.

Findings by Severity

Severity	Count
🔵 Low	1

Review effort: 2/5 (Simple)

Summary

This PR is well-structured and follows established repo patterns throughout. The new smart-money-pnl-leaderboard command, the query-options.js extraction, and the --limit validation fix are all sound. Validation logic is thorough: timeframe allowlist, strict pagination validation, cleanBody properly strips undefined/empty-object fields before the API call, and the filters default ({}) is consistent with every other API method.

Findings (1 low)

src/cli.js — export statement interleaved between import statements (low)

Lines 16–17 in the diff:

import { buildPagination, parseSort } from './query-options.js';
export { buildPagination, parseSort };
import { resolveAddress, isEnsName } from './ens.js';

The re-export is sandwiched between two import blocks, which is syntactically valid ESM but inconsistent with every other export pattern in this codebase (all other re-exports and named exports appear either co-located with their definitions or after all imports). It won't cause a runtime error and ESLint won't flag it under the current config, but it's surprising to read.

Suggested fix: Move the export { buildPagination, parseSort }; line to after all import statements, or use a single export { buildPagination, parseSort } from './query-options.js'; form to make the re-export intent immediately obvious.

---

Token usage: 1,362 input, 6,648 output, 1,003,870 cache read, 38,007 cache write | Usage Guide

New pushes are reviewed automatically with a 10-minute cooldown between reviews. To request a review at any time, comment @nansen-pr-reviewer re-review.

[nansen-pr-reviewer]

Auto-approved

This PR was automatically approved because:

• Claude recommends approval
• Claude assessed this as a moderate effort change
• The effort level is within the auto-approval threshold of 2
• No high or critical issues were detected
• Review comment contains non-blocking feedback

If you have any concerns, please request a manual review.

[nansen-pr-reviewer]

Auto-approved

This PR was automatically approved because:

• Claude recommends approval
• Claude assessed this as a moderate effort change
• The effort level is within the auto-approval threshold of 2
• No high or critical issues were detected
• Review comment contains non-blocking feedback

If you have any concerns, please request a manual review.

[nansen-pr-reviewer]

Auto-approved

This PR was automatically approved because:

• Claude recommends approval
• Claude assessed this as a moderate effort change
• The effort level is within the auto-approval threshold of 2
• No high or critical issues were detected
• Review comment contains non-blocking feedback

If you have any concerns, please request a manual review.

[nansen-pr-reviewer]

Auto-approved

This PR was automatically approved because:

• Claude recommends approval
• Claude assessed this as a moderate effort change
• The effort level is within the auto-approval threshold of 2
• No high or critical issues were detected
• Review comment contains non-blocking feedback

If you have any concerns, please request a manual review.

[nansen-pr-reviewer]

Auto-approved

This PR was automatically approved because:

• Claude recommends approval
• Claude assessed this as a moderate effort change
• The effort level is within the auto-approval threshold of 2
• No high or critical issues were detected
• Review comment contains non-blocking feedback

If you have any concerns, please request a manual review.